Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 2;9:900. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03271-3

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics

Data collection and processing
Magnification 36,764
Voltage (kV) 300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 24 
Defocus range (μm) −1.4 to −3.2
Pixel size (Å) 0.68 (Super-resolution mode)
Symmetry imposed C2
Initial particle images (no.) 1,729,419
Final particle images (no.) 184,561
Map resolution (Å) 3.9
  FSC threshold 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3–5
Refinement
Model resolution cutoff (Å) 3.9
  FSC threshold 0.143
Map sharpening B-factor (Å2) −240
Model composition
  Non-hydrogen atoms 7344
  Protein residues 948 (474 per protomer)
  Ligands 0
R.m.s. deviations
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.009
  Bond angles (°) 1.288
Validation
MolProbity score 2.11
  Clashscore 9.23
  Poor rotamers (%) 0
Ramachandran plot
  Favored (%) 86.99
  Allowed (%) 13.01
  Disallowed (%) 0