Table 4.
Percentage of participants with a stronger average indirect task response to child stimuli and rank-biserial correlation between having a stronger response to children and ICM scores
| n | Percentage of strongest response to child stimuli (%) | Correlation with ICM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r rb | BCa 95% CI | |||
| Reaction time measures | ||||
| P-MST | 98 | 29.6 | .07 | [− .14, .28] |
| CRT | 100 | 56.0 | .08 | [− .12, .26] |
| f-IAT | 100 | 44.0 | .04 | [− .16, .24] |
| Viewing time tasks | ||||
| NRP | 102 | 40.2 | − .02 | [− .21, .18] |
| Beach | 100 | 8.0 | .25 | [.003, .44] |
| Pupil dilation | ||||
| NRP | 100 | 83.0 | .32 | [.16, .45] |
| Beach (VT) | 100 | 13.0 | .10 | [− .11, .30] |
| Beach (free) | 100 | 14.0 | .05 | [− .15, .26] |
P-MST, pictorial modified Stroop task; f-IAT, factorial Implicit Association Test; NRP, not real people image set (Laws & Gress, 2004); VT, viewing time; r rb, rank-biserial correlation coefficient; BCa 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals based on 5000 resamples using the bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap method