Table 1.
Number of songs | Number of calls | Number of attacks | Number of wing flicks | Min approach distance | Ln time to min approach | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Song type (adjusted vs. unadjusted) | −1.16 ± 0.93 (0.214) | 8.27 ± 3.45 (0.017) | −1.44 ± 0.45 (0.001) | −0.94 ± 0.42 (0.025) | 2.76 ± 2.8 (0.351) | −0.04 ± 0.2 (0.833) |
CORT | −0.41 ± 1.22 (0.739) | 16.16 ± 7.74 (0.037) | 0.66 ± 0.61 (0.277) | 0.05 ± 0.73 (0.943) | 0.69 ± 2.98 (0.819) | −1.15 ± 0.37 (0.009) |
Song type x CORT | 3.86 ± 1.47 (0.008) | −15.58 ± 7.81 (0.046) | 0.93 ± 0.61 (0.126) | 1.24 ± 0.69 (0.071) | −3.79 ± 3.72 (0.335) | 0.12 ± 0.26 (0.669) |
Results are given as coefficient ±s.e. (P), with P ≤ 0.05 in bold. Categorical variables are shown with 1 vs. 0 (i.e. adjusted = 1 and unadjusted = 0), such that a positive β indicates an increase with category 1.We fit generalised linear mixed models with song played, adrenocortical responsiveness and two-way interactions as fixed effects, with male ID as a random effect, using only data from control sites. Playbacks (n = 19) to individuals (n = 11) were divided by song type: unadjusted songs at control sites (n = 10) and adjusted songs at control sites (n = 9).