Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 3;8:54. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0103-0

Fig. 2. Reward contingency results.

Fig. 2

a Mean (SEM) causal ratings obtained after each block of the high-contingency action was higher than the low-contingency action in healthy adults (HA) and people with schizophrenia (SZ). b Mean (SEM) action–outcome contingencies (post hoc) experienced by each group confirmed that the high-contingency action was higher than the low-contingency action. c Mean (SEM) correlation (Pearson r) between causal judgments and experienced contingency was greater for HA than for SZ, **p < .01. Individual correlations shown as scatter dots