Table 3.

Correlations among fruit traits and main oil quality components evaluated in the three groups of samples: wilds, cultivars, and crosses from top to bottom.

	C16:0	C16:1	C18:1	C18:2	TO	SQ	ST
C16:0	x	0.72	-0.85	0.55	0.14	-0.18	0.03
	x	0.68	-0.81	0.60	0.34	-0.31	0.52
	x	0.90	-0.89	0.12	0.13	-0.31	0.06
C16:1	<0.0001	x	-0.48	0.12	0.02	-0.32	0.18
	<0.0001	x	-0.35	0.10	0.29	-0.24	0.43
	<0.0001	x	-0.81	0.09	0.24	-0.40	0.13
C18:1	<0.0001	0.0055	x	-0.90	0.02	0.24	0.04
	<0.0001	0.0048	x	-0.95	-0.29	0.41	-0.61
	<0.0001	<0.0001	x	-0.54	-0.13	0.40	-0.11
C18:2	0.0011	0.4986	<0.0001	x	-0.14	-0.20	-0.13
	<0.0001	0.4476	<0.0001	x	0.23	-0.42	0.54
	0.3656	0.4913	<0.0001	x	-0.05	-0.27	0.04
TO	0.4591	0.9109	0.9289	0.4326	x	0.21	0.32
	0.0064	0.0223	0.0206	0.0773	x	-0.49	0.23
	0.3211	0.0626	0.3009	0.6992	x	0.03	0.53
SQ	0.3108	0.0778	0.1882	0.2744	0.2444	x	-0.05
	0.0152	0.0650	0.0011	0.0007	<0.0001	x	-0.34
	0.0135	0.0012	0.0015	0.0327	0.8108	x	0.21
ST	0.8687	0.3144	0.8383	0.4843	0.0742	0.8012	x
	<0.0001	0.0006	<0.0001	<0.0001	0.0716	0.0066	x
	0.6523	0.3134	0.3818	0.7762	<0.0001	0.0977	x

Pearson correlation coefficients and signification levels are indicated above and below the diagonal, respectively.