Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb;8(1):14–24. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.02.01

Table 2. Pearson univariate analysis.

TA parameters IF-p series (mean ± SD) C-p series (mean ± SD) P value
Kurtosis (L5) 5.98±1.92 5.23±1.23 0.049
Energy (L5) 0.050±0.0098 0.044±0.006 0.007
GLCM-energy (L5) 0.0049±0.0018 0.0041±0.0011 0.023
Kurtosis (sacrum) 6.791±2.42 5.78±1.50 0.034
Compacity (sacrum) 3.86±1.26 3.40±0.50 0.039
Kurtosis (FH) 6.58±1.60 5.73±0.85 0.005
Skewness (FH) 1.86±0.25 1.68±0.19 0.001
Energy (FH) 0.041±0.0059 0.038±0.0041 0.005
GLCM-homogeneity (FH) 0.38±0.026 0.37±0.020 0.006
GLCM-energy (FH) 0.0046±0.0013 0.0040±0.00098 0.020

TA, texture analysis; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; IF, insufficiency fracture; FH, femoral head.