Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb;8(1):32–38. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.02.03

Table 2. L2 bone mineral density and their statistics under different mAs and different iterative algorithms.

Algorithms 20 mAs 30 mAs 40 mAs 50 mAs 60 mAs P
FBP 97.94 98.29 98.23 98.57 98.08 0.146
iDose4 [1] 101.83 100.4 100.27 100.13 99.51 0.137
iDose4 [2] 101.44 101.12 100.4 99.88 99.75 0.37
iDose4 [3] 101.77 100.87 99.81 100.39 100.04 0.163
iDose4 [4] 101.42 100.45 100.05 100.49 100.28 0.12
iDose4 [5] 101.62 101.25 99.85 100.68 99.71 0.129
iDose4 [6] 101.84 101.21 100.45 99.92 99.45 0.064
IMR [1] 100.85 99.49 99.19 99.15 99.13 0.229
IMR [2] 100.8 99.91 99.21 98.81 98.98 0.08
IMR [3] 100.15 99.23 98.75 98.77 98.65 0.194
P 0.051 0.061 0.076 0.079 0.075

FBP, filtered back projection; IMR, iterative model reconstruction.