Abstract
Cartilage repair after degeneration or trauma continues to be a challenge both in the clinic and for scientific research due to the limited regenerative capacity of this tissue. Cartilage tissue engineering, involving a combination of cells, scaffolds, and growth factors, is increasingly used in cartilage regeneration. Due to their ease of synthesis, robustness, tunable size, availability of functional groups, and activity, peptides have emerged as the molecules with the most potential in drug development. A number of peptides have been engineered to regenerate cartilage by acting as scaffolds, functional molecules, or both. In this paper, we will summarize the application of peptides in cartilage tissue engineering and discuss additional possibilities for peptides in this field.
Keywords: Peptide, cartilage repair, cartilage tissue engineering, transforming growth factor-β, mesenchy-mal stem cells, peptide hydrogel
Introduction
Cartilage repair remains a challenge both in the clinic and for scientific research due to the limited regenerative capacity of this tissue [1]. Over the last two decades, the development of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has resulted in significant progress in this field [2,3]. To date, ACI is the golden therapy for articular cartilage defects in the absence of osteoarthritis and other complications. However, propagation of chondrocytes in monolayers in vitro often leads to chondrocyte dedifferentiation, notably compromising the outcome of ACI and, thus, being a major obstacle for the wide application of ACI [4,5].
Cartilage tissue engineering uses a combination of scaffolds, cells, and certain active molecules to produce functional human cartilage with which to repair tissue defects [6-8]. To attain this goal, biomimetic scaffold materials, different stem cell types, and optimized differentiation protocols have been developed [9-11].
Peptides have been widely used in drug development and biotechnology over the past decade [12]. Peptides can mimic the functions of proteins but with a lower production complexity and cost. In addition, peptides can target curtain “flat pockets” that are undruggable by small molecules [13]. Peptides are easily synthesized, robust, and have tunable sizes, functional groups, and activity, making peptides the molecules with the most potential for drug development.
A number of peptides are involved in orthopedic disorders [14]. Some of these have already been translated into the clinic, such as parathyroid hormone 1-34 peptides, which are used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [15]. Other peptides have been used in scientific research on cartilage tissue engineering, where they function as active molecules, in cell adsorption, as enrichment motifs, and as scaffolds (Figure 1). Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify peptides related to cartilage engineering and identify novel prospects for peptides in this field.
Figure 1.
The use of peptides in cartilage tissue engineering, which utilizes a combination of growth factors, cells, and scaffolds. In terms of growth factors, TGF-β mimetic, cell penetrating, and growth factor affinity peptides work by mimicking, delivering, and recruiting growth factors, respectively. For cells, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) affinity peptides work through MSC recruitment and in situ purification. For scaffolds, peptides work by self-assembling into hydrogel, thus mimicking the native environment of cartilage using affinity peptides and increasing degradation using degradable peptides.
Results
Transforming growth factor-β mimetic peptides
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has crucial roles in cell differentiation, collagen synthesis, and matrix deposition in cartilage tissue engineering [16]. However, its instability and dilution in vivo are two significant points of concern [17]. In addition, purification is expensive, making it even more difficult to use in the clinic. Therefore, peptides able to mimic TGF-β activity have a promising role in cartilage tissue engineering due to their low costs, stability, long shelf-life, and ease of administration and controlled release.
TGF-β mimetic peptides, i.e., cytomodulins (CMs), are oligopeptides developed to function similarly to TGF-β [18]. These peptides contain 4-6 amino acids with a β-bend secondary structure under physiologic conditions. Furthermore, the first three and last residues are limited to certain amino acids. Like TGF-β, CMs can enhance collagen I expression in fibroblasts and aid in wound healing in vitro [19,20]. In addition, when conjugated to a poly (lactide-co-glycolide) scaffold, CM-1 can increase wound healing in a full-thickness wound mouse model [21]. However, unlike TGF-β, CMs in a soluble form are unable to effectively induce chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells [22]. These peptides can induce chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) only when ligated to the surface of microspheres [23]. These differences may be due to immobilization of the peptides slowing their degradation and constraining their secondary structure to an active one.
To test this hypothesis, we synthesized several peptides and assessed their activity using human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) that had been isolated from human umbilical cords and identified by flow cytometry (Figure 2A, 2B). Two peptides derived from CM-10 and designated CM-10-D1 and CM-10-D2 were synthesized. To generate CM-10-D1 (Leu-Ile-Ala-Asn-Aib-Lys), the alanine in CM-10 was substituted with the unnatural amino acid aminoisobutyric acid to increase peptide stability. However, CM-10-D1 was unable to increase collagen II expression in hUC-MSCs when used in combination with basic chondrogenic differentiation media (Figure 2C). Therefore, the secondary structure of these TGF-β mimetic peptides was considered next. As illustrated in the patent, these peptides have a β-bend secondary structure [18]. D-pro-L-pro is a well-known dipeptide fragment that can initiate anti-parallel strands [24]. This fragment was therefore used to constrain the secondary structure of the peptides and CM-10-D2 (Leo-Ile-Ala-Asn-Ala-Lys-L-pro-D-pro-Lys-Ala-Asn-Ala-Ile-Leo) was synthesized. CM-10-D2 was assumed to have both a β-bend structure and a two-fold higher concentration. However, when these peptides were used to induce chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the results remained negative (Figure 2C).
Figure 2.
Chondrogenic potential of TGF-β mimetic peptide. A, B. Analysis of human umbilical cord-MSCs by flow cytometry, where cells are CD34 and CD45 negative (97.5%) and CD73 and CD90 positive (99.3%). C. Col2a1 expression in human umbilical cord-MSCs induced with CM-10, CM-10-D1 and CM-10-D2 (10 µM) for 21 days as analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (GAPHD house-keeping gene used as internal control).
As a result of these experiments, it was concluded to be difficult to design an active TGF-β mimetic peptide as how the peptide was designed was absent from the patent. Furthermore, the peptides were too short to allow for certain motifs to be introduced to constrain the structure. CM-10 has a positive effect when ligated to scaffolds, so perhaps this is the optimal manner in which to use these peptides as free peptides may actually be unstable and easy diluted in vivo.
Cell-penetrating peptides
Cell-penetrating peptides are peptides that can penetrate the cell membrane and deliver their ‘cargo’, including proteins, small interfering RNAs, nanoparticles, oligonucleotides, and other peptides, into the cytoplasm [25]. Because TGF-β and other proteins regulate chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells, studies based on transfection of these genes into stem cells using adenoviral and lentiviral vectors have been conducted [26]. However, translation of these techniques incurs the risk of tumorigenesis and pathogenic contamination. Cell-penetrating peptides can transport certain genes into cells without incurring any of the risks mentioned above. You et al. used the NLS-TAT peptide to deliver the hTGF-β3 plasmid into precartilaginous stem cells, which promotes chondrogenesis of these cells [27]. Furthermore, they used this peptide as a carrier for the hTGF-β3 plasmid on a self-assembled peptide scaffold [28]. Some microRNAs, such as miR-140, play crucial roles in cartilage homeostasis and can also be delivered into cells by cell-penetrating peptides [29,30].
Affinity peptides
Peptides with the ability to bind to specific cells, scaffolds, and cytokines are major contributors to the construction of engineered cartilage. Below, we will review the related studies in three parts.
Cells are recruited and adhere to the scaffolds when using cell-adhesive scaffolds. This method was first performed using a chondrocyte-specific antibody. Lin et al. later used anti-CD44 antibody and the biotin-avidin binding system to improve cell adhesion and cartilage repair [31]. However, the high cost and difficulty of antibody loading in this system make it impracticable. Cell affinity peptides are a better alternative due to being easier to synthesize and ligate onto the scaffold. Several CD-44 affinity peptides have been reported that could be used to replace this antibody-biotin-avidin system [32-34]. Baron et al. developed a chondrocyte affinity peptide using phage display [35]. When conjugating this peptide onto scaffolds, there was increased cell adhesion that potentially increased the repair of defects. Chondrocyte affinity peptides can also increase the integration of scaffolds and tissues due to their ability to bind cells at the sites of defects. In addition to chondrocyte affinity peptides, MSC affinity peptides can be used to construct cell-free scaffolds used to repair cartilage defects, where they recruit autologous MSCs. Ao et al. developed several MSC affinity peptides and used them to repair cartilage defects [36-39]. E7 is a peptide screened by phage display with a high affinity towards bone marrow-derived MSCs. E7 was covalently conjugated onto polycaprolactone electrospun meshes to construct an “MSC-homing device” [36]. This scaffold was implanted into a cartilage defect in a rat knee joint using a microfracture procedure. After 7 days, immunofluorescence staining revealed significantly more cells growing on this scaffold expressed MSC-specific surface markers than a RGD-conjugated scaffold. Furthermore, the percentage of CD68 positive cells in E7-conjugated scaffolds was much lower than that in the RGD peptide-conjugated scaffolds, suggesting the E7-conjugated scaffolds absorb fewer inflammatory cells. By selectively recruiting MSCs, MSC-affinity peptides on the scaffolds act as enrichment and purification tools in vivo [40].
In addition to MSCs, bone marrow also contains growth factors. TGF-β affinity peptide can recruit TGF-β to the impaired region following microfracture surgery [41,42]. Stupp et al. developed a TGF-β1 affinity peptide and ligated it to peptide amphiphile nanofibers [42]. In vitro experiments indicate that this scaffold promotes the survival and chondrogenic differentiation of human MSCs. Furthermore, they confirmed the efficacy of this scaffold in repair of cartilage using a rabbit model. In addition to recruiting TGF-β in vivo, this peptide also overcomes the dilution problem of TGF-β, where a controlled release system can be built by reserving TGF-β in the scaffold using affinity peptides.
To recreate the biochemical and biomechanical functions of cartilage, different types of scaffolds have been developed. However, accurate recreation is still a significant challenge because the native environment of cartilage is complex and dynamic. Extracellular matrix (ECM) molecule affinity peptides can help mimic the native environment of chondrocytes and, thus, are frequently used as scaffold elements [43,44]. Incorporating ECM molecules into a scaffold via affinity peptides avoids chemical modifications when constructing scaffolds, which may influence the degradation and biological functions of these molecules [45]. Bryant et al. demonstrated the promise of this strategy by successfully retaining chondrocyte-secreted proteoglycans in hyaluronic acid (HA)-binding peptide-modified poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels using exogenous HA for 28 days [46]. In cartilage, ECM molecule concentrations increase gradually from the articulating surface towards the bone. Controlling the arrangement of these biomolecules is therefore of great interest when striving to mimic native tissues [47,48]. Stevens et al. designed peptide-polycaprolactone conjugates with HA or chondroitin sulfate-binding sites in a specific spatial organization, which realized the biomimetic spatial distribution of HA and chondroitin sulfate [49]. This strategy successfully prepared a scaffold with the exceptional properties and functions of natural cartilage tissues. Besides the biochemical structure of cartilage, the biomechanical environment also needs to be considered. For affinity peptides, interactions with surrounding native ECM possibly mimic native ECM-like interactions, which may benefit cartilage regeneration. Stevens et al. reported that HAbinding and chondroitin sulfate-binding peptide-modified hydrogel significantly promote chondrogenesis of BMSCs [50]. Because the natural environment is complex, it is challenging to fully recaptiulate. However, using scaffold affinity peptides, we can synthesize versatile and well-designed biomimetic scaffolds.
Self-assembly peptides
Self-assembly peptides are composed of either alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids or peptide amphiphiles [51-53]. These peptides can self-assemble into nanofibers and form nanofibrous hydrogels. Compared to hydrogels derived from biomacromolecules, peptide hydrogels are easier to synthesize and pose no risk of animal-derived pathogens.
PuraMatrixTM (3DM Inc., Cambridge, MA) is a commercially available hydrogel formed by RADA16-1 peptide that can support cartilage formation from chondrocytes and MSCs [54,55]. Hydrogels formed from peptides with repeating KLD and RAD units can support cartilage formation comparably to agarose gels [56].
Peptide gels are amenable to incorporation of bioactive elements, especially bioactive peptides [57]. As shown in Figure 3, peptide gels can theoretically be created with specific properties or for specific cellular interactions by synthesizing scaffold peptide-functional peptide conjugates. For example, peptide gels with binding sites for TGF-β1 have been prepared by synthesizing peptide amphiphile-TGF-β1 affinity peptide conjugates [42], resulting in controlled release systems that facilitate chondrogenic differentiation of encapsulated MSCs in vitro within 4 weeks.
Figure 3.
Schematic of the incorporation of bioactive peptides into self-assembly through peptide amphiphiles. The peptides form nanofibers through self-assembly with the hydrophobic terminal (red) as the interior and hydrophilic terminal (blue) as the exterior. Bioactive peptides (green) bind outside of nanofibers by ligating to the hydrophilic terminal.
Degradable peptides
Scaffolds provide three-dimensional structures for cells, enhance reservation of cells, and concurrently increase matrix synthesis. However, rates of degradation for many scaffolds are lower than the rates of matrix deposition by encapsulated cells [58]. Therefore, accelerating degradation of the scaffolds can make room for newly synthesized matrix.
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) cleave collagen, gelatin, and other proteins in ECM [59]. Scaffolds linked through MMP-degradable peptides degrade faster in the presence of MMPs [50,60]. Anseth et al. crosslinked poly (ethylene glycol) norbornene hydrogels with MMP-degradable peptides [60] and found this scaffold had significantly higher glycosaminoglycan and collagen deposition than control gels after 14 days of culture.
Other functional peptides
Other functional peptides, such as RGD peptides, are also used in cartilage tissue engineering to aid in cell adhesion [61-63]. As reported, a low RGD density is effective for chondrogenic differentiation, while a high RGD density often results in hypertrophy due to activation of integrins [64-66]. RGD can also increase adhesion of inflammatory cells and offset repair [36]. Therefore, RGD peptides are more useful in bone healing [67].
N-cadherin is a key factor mediating cell-cell interactions during mesenchymal condensation and chondrogenesis [68]. The introduction of N-cadherin mimetic peptides into scaffolds can promote both early chondrogenesis of MSCs and late cartilage-specific matrix production [69].
The use of laminin-derived peptides on chitosan/gelatin surfaces promotes attachment and neuronal differentiation of stem cells [70]. Kuo et al. found that laminin-related peptide on scaffolds increased adhesion of bovine knee chondrocytes and enhanced expression of glycosaminoglycans and collagen [71].
Discussion
Cartilage tissue engineering is a growing biomedical field. Meanwhile, peptides have been applied in a wide range of applications in medicine and biotechnology over the past decade. Therefore, combining cartilage tissue engineering and the use of peptides may create a number of opportunities. Table 1 lists the peptides discussed in this review.
Table 1.
List of the peptides involved in cartilage tissue engineering
Name | Sequence | Function |
---|---|---|
Cytomodulins [18-23] | AA1-AA2-AA3…AAn (AA1 = A, N, L; AA2 = V, I; AA3 = A; AAn = Q, D, E, N) | TGF-β mimetic peptides |
NLS-TAT [27,28] | PKKKRKVKGRKKRRQRRRPPQ | Delivery of nucleic acid |
E7 [36-38,40] | EPLQLKM | Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell affinity peptide |
L7 [39] | LTHPRWP | Synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cell affinity peptide |
TGFBP [42] | HSNGLPL | TGF-β affinity peptide |
HA binding peptide [46,47,50] | RYPISRPRKRC | Binds specifically to Hyaluronan |
Chondroitin sulphate binding peptide [49,50] | YKTNFRRYYRF | Binds specifically to chondroitin sulphate |
RADA16-1 [54,55] | RADARADARADARADA | Forms hydrogel for scaffold |
KLD-12 [56] | KLDLKLDLKLDL | Forms hydrogel for scaffold |
RGD peptide [61-63] | Cyclic RGD | Aids cellular adhesion to scaffolds |
MMP7-cleavable peptide [50] | CGGGPLELRAGGGC | Cleaved specifically by matrix metalloproteinase-7 |
MMP-degradable peptide [60] | KCGPQGIWGQCK | Cleaved by matrix metalloproteinase |
N-cadherin mimic peptide [69] | HAVDIGGGC | Mimics the function of N-cadherin |
Laminin-derived peptides [71] | CDPGYIGSR | Aids in the growth of bovine knee chondrocytes |
TGF-β is a key factor in chondrogenic differentiation, but several drawbacks, including high cost, delivery issues, a short shelf life, in vivo dilution, and potential immunogenicity, hinder its widespread use, including in the clinic. Peptide mimetics can exert effects similar to factors such as TGF-β and overcome the problems mentioned above. However, free mimetic peptides fail to facilitate chondrogenesis, including in two unsuccessful avenues of optimization that were attempted in this study. Fortunately, peptides can promote cartilage formation when ligated onto scaffolds. Concurrently, TGF-β affinity peptide can recruit TGF-β to the defect from the bone marrow to assist cartilage regeneration. With these peptides in hand, we have some exogenous TGF-β alternatives available.
The variability of MSC preparations makes clinical translation difficult. Further in situ purification is realizable through the use of affinity peptides. In addition, exosomes secreted by MSCs have similar functions, but are less complex than MSCs, providing an alternative therapy for various inflammation-related diseases, including osteoarthritis [72-74]. As reported by Zhu et al., exosomes derived from MSCs increase the proliferation and migration of chondrocytes in vitro, and exert notable therapeutic effects in a collagenase-induced osteoarthritis mouse model [75], while exosome-laden hydrogels can drive cartilage regeneration in a rabbit model of cartilage defect [76]. Peptides can be used in target delivery of exosomes and peptides that bind specifically to exosomes have been reported as well [77-80]. In the future, combining exosomes and peptides will likely open up new areas for cartilage tissue engineering.
Conclusion
Peptides have multiple functions in cartilage tissue engineering. Maturation of our knowledge in this field will give rise to novel applications for peptides in cartilage repair.
Materials and method
Cell culture
The collection of human umbilical cord was approved by Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital. After the isolation of Wharton’s jelly, we cut the jelly into 1-2 mm3 cube and attached them on the plate, subsequently incubated with the medium (MesenGro medium, StemRD, MGro-500B; 10% FBS, Compass Biomedical, PLS6; 10 µg/L basic fibroblast growth factor, PeproTech, 100-31; 100 U/ml Penicillin-Streptomycin, Gibco, 15140-122) at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 7-10 days’ incubation, we digested the cells with 0.25% trypsin (Gibco, 25200-072) and cultured the cells for further use.
Flow cytometry analysis
hUC-MSCs were lifted by 0.25% trypsin and washed with PBS for three times. After wash, cells were suspended in PBS with a concentration of 5 × 105/100 µL. 2 µL of the antibody solution (PE Mouse Anti-Human CD45, BD Sciences, 555483; FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD34, BD Science, 555821; PE Mouse Anti-Human CD73, BD Science, 55257; FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD90, BD Science, 555595) were added to the cell suspension. After mixing with taping, the cells were incubated with the antibody for 1 hr at room temperature protected from light. Before loading to the machine (BD Sciences), the cells were washed with PBS once and suspended with 500 µL PBS.
Chondrogenic differentiation
hUC-MSCs P3 cells were seeded in 6-well plates with cell density of 50,000 cells/well. Cells differentiation were induced with 10 µM peptides, 0.1 mM dexamethasone (Sigma, D4902-100MG), and 50 mg/mL ascorbate (Sigma, A7631-25G) in DMEM High Glucose (Gibco, 11965-092) medium.
The media were changed every 3 days. After 21 days, RNA was purified with TRIzol (Invitrogen, 15596026). The expression level of Ca2a1 was detected by real-time PCR (GPADH-Forward: 5’-GATCATCAGCAATGCCTCCT-3’; GPADH-Reverse: 5’-TGTGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCA-3’; Col2a1-Forward: 5’-CAACCAGGACCAAAGGG-ACA-3’; Col2a1-Reverse: 5’-ACCTTTGTCACCAC-GATCCC3’).
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as means ± SD. All statistical analyses were performed using Graph-Pad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the following grants: Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572198; No. 81772394; No. 21602137; No. 81672186; No. 81472100); Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2015A030313772); The Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. A2016314); Shenzhen Science and Technology Projects (No. JCYJ20170306092215436; No. JCYJ20170412150609690; No. JCYJ20170413161800287; No. SGLH20161209105517753; No. JCYJ20160301111338144; No. JSGG20151030140325149; No. JCYJ20160425104312430); Fund for High Level Medical Discipline Construction of Shenzhen University (No. 2016031638). We thank Prof. Zigang Li from Peking University for peptide design and synthesis.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Johnstone B, Alini M, Cucchiarini M, Dodge GR, Eglin D, Guilak F, Madry H, Mata A, Mauck RL, Semino CE, Stoddart MJ. Tissue engineering for articular cartilage repair--the state of the art. Eur Cell Mater. 2013;25:248–267. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v025a18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang YZ, Zhang SF, Qi YY, Wang LL, Ouyang HW. Cell transplantation for articular cartilage defects: principles of past, present, and future practice. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:593–607. doi: 10.3727/096368910X532738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kon E, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. ACI and MACI. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:17–22. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Duan L, Ma B, Liang Y, Chen J, Zhu W, Li M, Wang D. Cytokine networking of chondrocyte dedifferentiation in vitro and its implications for cell-based cartilage therapy. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:194–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lin Z, Fitzgerald JB, Xu J, Willers C, Wood D, Grodzinsky AJ, Zheng MH. Gene expression profiles of human chondrocytes during passaged monolayer cultivation. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1230–1237. doi: 10.1002/jor.20523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuo CK, Li WJ, Mauck RL, Tuan RS. Cartilage tissue engineering: Its potential and uses. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:64–73. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000198005.88568.df. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang L, Hu J, Athanasiou KA. The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;37:1–57. doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v37.i1-2.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Makris EA, Gomoll AH, Malizos KN, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:21–34. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lim EH, Sardinha JP, Myers S. Nanotechnology biomimetic cartilage regenerative scaffolds. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41:231–240. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.3.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee WY, Wang B. Cartilage repair by mesenchymal stem cells. Clinical trial update and perspectives. J Orthop Trans. 2017;9:76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2017.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guha TS, Budhiraja G, Subramanian A. Growth factor and ultrasound-assisted bioreactor synergism for human mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. J Tissue Eng. 2015;6:2041731414566529. doi: 10.1177/2041731414566529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du QS, Xie NZ, Huang RB. Recent development of peptide drugs and advance on theory and methodology of peptide inhibitor design. Med Chem. 2015;11:235–247. doi: 10.2174/1573406411666141229163355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tsomaia N. Peptide therapeutics: targeting the undruggable space. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;94:459–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pountos I, Panteli M, Lampropoulos A, Jones E, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of peptides in bone healing and regeneration: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2016;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0646-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitfield JF, Morley P, Willick GE. Parathyroid hormone, its fragments and their analogs for the treatment of osteoporosis. Treat Endocrinol. 2002;1:175–190. doi: 10.2165/00024677-200201030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang W, Rigueur D, Lyons KM. TGFbeta signaling in cartilage development and maintenance. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2014;102:37–51. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Masters KS. Covalent growth factor immobilization strategies for tissue repair and regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11:1149–1163. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bhatnagar RS, Qian JJ, inventors. Peptide compositions with growth factor-like activity. CN 96193633. U. S. Patent. 1996
- 19.Lam HJ, Li S, Lou N, Chu J, Bhatnagar RS. Synthetic peptides cytomodulin-1 (CM-1) and cytomodulin-2 (CM-2) promote collagen synthesis and wound healing in vitro. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;7:5028–5030. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1404389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Basu S, Kumar M, Chansuria JP, Singh TB, Bhatnagar R, Shukla VK. Effect of Cytomodulin-10 (TGF-beta1 analogue) on wound healing by primary intention in a murine model. Int J Surg. 2009;7:460–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mittal A, Kumar R, Parsad D, Kumar N. Cytomodulin-functionalized porous PLGA particulate scaffolds respond better to cell migration, actin production and wound healing in rodent model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8:351–36. doi: 10.1002/term.1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Renner JN, Liu JC. Investigating the effect of peptide agonists on the chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells using design of experiments. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:1550–1557. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Z, Gupte MJ, Jin X, Ma PX. Injectable peptide decorated functional nanofibrous hollow microspheres to direct stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:350–360. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao B, Yang D, Wong JH, Wang J, Yin C, Zhu Y, Fan S, Ng TB, Xia J, Li Z. A Thioether-stabilized d-proline-l-proline-induced beta-hairpin peptide of defensin segment increases its Anti-candida albicans ability. Chembiochem. 2016;17:1416–1420. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201600179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ruczynski J, Wierzbicki PM, Kogut-Wierzbicka M, Mucha P, Siedlecka-Kroplewska K, Rekowski P. Cell-penetrating peptides as a promising tool for delivery of various molecules into the cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2014;52:257–269. doi: 10.5603/FHC.a2014.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saraf A, Mikos AG. Gene delivery strategies for cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:592–603. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guo X, Chu X, Li W, Pan Q, You H. Chondrogenic effect of precartilaginous stem cells following NLS-TAT cell penetrating peptide-assisted transfection of eukaryotic hTGFbeta3. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114:2588–2594. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pan Q, Li W, Yuan X, Rakhmanov Y, Wang P, Lu R, Mao Z, Shang X, You H. Chondrogenic effect of cell-based scaffold of self-assembling peptides/PLGA-PLL loading the hTGFbeta3 plasmid DNA. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27:19. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5631-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gibson G, Asahara H. MicroRNAs and cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:1333–1344. doi: 10.1002/jor.22397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liang Y, Duan L, Xiong J, Zhu W, Liu Q, Wang D, Liu W, Li Z, Wang D. E2 regulates MMP-13 via targeting miR-140 in IL-1beta-induced extracellular matrix degradation in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:105. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0997-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin H, Zhou J, Shen L, Ruan Y, Dong J, Guo C, Chen Z. Biotin-conjugated anti-CD44 antibody-avidin binding system for the improvement of chondrocyte adhesion to scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:1140–1148. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ugarte-Berzal E, Bailon E, Amigo-Jimenez I, Albar JP, Garcia-Marco JA, Garcia-Pardo A. A novel CD44-binding peptide from the pro-matrix metalloproteinase-9 hemopexin domain impairs adhesion and migration of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:15340–15349. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.559187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Park HY, Lee KJ, Lee SJ, Yoon MY. Screening of peptides bound to breast cancer stem cell specific surface marker CD44 by phage display. Mol Biotechnol. 2012;51:212–220. doi: 10.1007/s12033-011-9458-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang D, Jia H, Wang Y, Li WM, Hou YC, Yin SW, Wang TD, He SX, Lu SY. A CD44 specific peptide developed by phage display for targeting gastric cancer. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37:2311–2320. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-1896-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cheung CS, Lui JC, Baron J. Identification of chondrocyte-binding peptides by phage display. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:1053–1058. doi: 10.1002/jor.22325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shao Z, Zhang X, Pi Y, Wang X, Jia Z, Zhu J, Dai L, Chen W, Yin L, Chen H, Zhou C, Ao Y. Polycaprolactone electrospun mesh conjugated with an MSC affinity peptide for MSC homing in vivo. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3375–3387. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Huang H, Zhang X, Hu X, Shao Z, Zhu J, Dai L, Man Z, Yuan L, Chen H, Zhou C, Ao Y. A functional biphasic biomaterial homing mesenchymal stem cells for in vivo cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35:9608–9619. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meng Q, Man Z, Dai L, Huang H, Zhang X, Hu X, Shao Z, Zhu J, Zhang J, Fu X, Duan X, Ao Y. A composite scaffold of MSC affinity peptide-modified demineralized bone matrix particles and chitosan hydrogel for cartilage regeneration. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17802. doi: 10.1038/srep17802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shao Z, Zhang X, Pi Y, Yin L, Li L, Chen H, Zhou C, Ao Y. Surface modification on polycaprolactone electrospun mesh and human decalcified bone scaffold with synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells-affinity peptide for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103:318–329. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shafiq M, Kim SH. Covalent immobilization of MSC-affinity peptide on poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) copolymer to enhance stem cell adhesion and retention for tissue engineering applications. Macromol Res. 2016;24:986–994. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Webb DJ, Roadcap DW, Dhakephalkar A, Gonias SL. A 16-amino acid peptide from human alpha2-macroglobulin binds transforming growth factor-beta and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Protein Sci. 2000;9:1986–1992. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.10.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shah RN, Shah NA, Del Rosario Lim MM, Hsieh C, Nuber G, Stupp SI. Supramolecular design of self-assembling nanofibers for cartilage regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:3293–3298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906501107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thakkar S, Fernandes H, Moroni L. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1340:133–151. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Masters KS, Shah DN, Leinwand LA, Anseth KS. Crosslinked hyaluronan scaffolds as a biologically active carrier for valvular interstitial cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2517–2525. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mano JF, Silva GA, Azevedo HS, Malafaya PB, Sousa RA, Silva SS, Boesel LF, Oliveira JM, Santos TC, Marques AP, Neves NM, Reis RL. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4:999–1030. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roberts JJ, Elder RM, Neumann AJ, Jayaraman A, Bryant SJ. Interaction of hyaluronan binding peptides with glycosaminoglycans in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomcromolecules. 2014;15:1132–1141. doi: 10.1021/bm401524h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Leong KF, Chua CK, Sudarmadji N, Yeong WY. Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2008;1:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nguyen LH, Kudva AK, Saxena NS, Roy K. Engineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6946–6952. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chow LW, Armgarth A, St-Pierre JP, Bertazzo S, Gentilini C, Aurisicchio C, McCullen SD, Steele JA, Stevens MM. Peptide-directed spatial organization of biomolecules in dynamic gradient scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3:1381–1386. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parmar PA, Chow LW, St-Pierre JP, Horejs CM, Peng YY, Werkmeister JA, Ramshaw JA, Stevens MM. Collagen-mimetic peptide-modifiable hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials. 2015;54:213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang S. Emerging biological materials through molecular self-assembly. Biotechnol Adv. 2002;20:321–339. doi: 10.1016/s0734-9750(02)00026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ryan DM, Nilsson BL. Self-assembled amino acids and dipeptides as noncovalent hydrogels for tissue engineering. Polym Chem-UK. 2011;1:18–33. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Avinash MB, Govindaraju T. Nanoarchitectonics of biomolecular assemblies for functional applications. Nanoscale. 2014;6:13348–13369. doi: 10.1039/c4nr04340e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Recha-Sancho L, Semino CE. Heparin-based self-assembling peptide scaffold reestablish chondrogenic phenotype of expanded de-differentiated human chondrocytes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:1694–1706. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yamaoka H, Asato H, Ogasawara T, Nishizawa S, Takahashi T, Nakatsuka T, Koshima I, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Chung UI, Takato T, Hoshi K. Cartilage tissue engineering using human auricular chondrocytes embedded in different hydrogel materials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78:1–11. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kisiday J, Jin M, Kurz B, Hung H, Semino C, Zhang S, Grodzinsky AJ. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel fosters chondrocyte extracellular matrix production and cell division: implications for cartilage tissue repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9996–10001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142309999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.He B, Yuan X, Zhou A, Zhang H, Jiang D. Designer functionalised self-assembling peptide nanofibre scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2014;16:e12. doi: 10.1017/erm.2014.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science. 2005;310:1135–1138. doi: 10.1126/science.1106587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jablonska-Trypuc A, Matejczyk M, Rosochacki S. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the main extracellular matrix (ECM) enzymes in collagen degradation, as a target for anticancer drugs. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2016;31:177–183. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2016.1161620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sridhar BV, Brock JL, Silver JS, Leight JL, Randolph MA, Anseth KS. Development of a cellularly degradable PEG hydrogel to promote articular cartilage extracellular matrix deposition. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:702–713. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. Arg-Gly-Asp: a versatile cell recognition signal. Cell. 1986;44:517–518. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90259-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jeschke B, Meyer J, Jonczyk A, Kessler H, Adamietz P, Meenen NM, Kantlehner M, Goepfert C, Nies B. RGD-peptides for tissue engineering of articular cartilage. Biomaterials. 2002;23:3455–3463. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim HD, Heo J, Hwang Y, Kwak SY, Park OK, Kim H, Varghese S, Hwang NS. Extracellular-matrix-based and Arg-Gly-Asp-modified photopolymerizing hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21:757–766. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kim IL, Khetan S, Baker BM, Chen CS, Burdick JA. Fibrous hyaluronic acid hydrogels that direct MSC chondrogenesis through mechanical and adhesive cues. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5571–5580. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Homandberg GA, Hui F. Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser peptide analogs suppress cartilage chondrolytic activities of integrin-binding and nonbinding fibronectin fragments. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;310:40–48. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang T, Wen F, Wu Y, Goh GS, Ge Z, Tan LP, Hui JH, Yang Z. Cross-talk between TGF-beta/SMAD and integrin signaling pathways in regulating hypertrophy of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis under deferral dynamic compression. Biomaterials. 2015;38:72–85. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pountos I, Panteli M, Lampropoulos A, Jones E, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of peptides in bone healing and regeneration: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2016;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0646-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tavella S, Raffo P, Tacchetti C, Cancedda R, Castagnola P. N-CAM and N-cadherin expression during in vitro chondrogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 1994;215:354–362. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bian L, Guvendiren M, Mauck RL, Burdick JA. Hydrogels that mimic developmentally relevant matrix and N-cadherin interactions enhance MSC chondrogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:10117–10122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214100110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kuo YC, Chiu KH. Inverted colloidal crystal scaffolds with laminin-derived peptides for neuronal differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32:819–831. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kuo YC, Wang CC. Surface modification with peptide for enhancing chondrocyte adhesion and cartilage regeneration in porous scaffolds. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;84:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Tse HF, Lian Q. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:1045–1059. doi: 10.3727/096368913X667709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tao SC, Yuan T, Zhang YL, Yin WJ, Guo SC, Zhang CQ. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model. Theranostics. 2017;7:180–195. doi: 10.7150/thno.17133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang Y, Yu D, Liu Z, Zhou F, Dai J, Wu B, Zhou J, Heng BC, Zou XH, Ouyang H, Liu H. Exosomes from embryonic mesenchymal stem cells alleviate osteoarthritis through balancing synthesis and degradation of cartilage extracellular matrix. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:189. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0632-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhao B, Niu X, Hu B, Li Q, Zhang J, Ding J, Chen Y, Wang Y. Comparison of exosomes secreted by induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells and synovial membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:64. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0510-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu X, Yang Y, Li Y, Niu X, Zhao B, Wang Y, Bao C, Xie Z, Lin Q, Zhu L. Integration of stem cell-derived exosomes with in situ hydrogel glue as a promising tissue patch for articular cartilage regeneration. Nanoscale. 2017;9:4430–4438. doi: 10.1039/c7nr00352h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hung ME, Leonard JN. Stabilization of exosome-targeting peptides via engineered glycosylation. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:8166–8172. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.621383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Saludes JP, Morton LA, Coulup SK, Fiorini Z, Cook BM, Beninson L, Chapman ER, Fleshner M, Yin H. Multivalency amplifies the selection and affinity of bradykinin-derived peptides for lipid nanovesicles. Mol Biosyst. 2013;9:2005–2009. doi: 10.1039/c3mb70109c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Saludes JP, Morton LA, Ghosh N, Beninson LA, Chapman ER, Fleshner M, Yin H. Detection of highly curved membrane surfaces using a cyclic peptide derived from synaptotagmin-I. ACS Chem Biol. 2012;7:1629–1635. doi: 10.1021/cb3002705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Morton LA, Yang H, Saludes JP, Fiorini Z, Beninson L, Chapman ER, Fleshner M, Xue D, Yin H. MARCKS-ED peptide as a curvature and lipid sensor. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:218–225. doi: 10.1021/cb300429e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]