Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;8(5):1376–1388. doi: 10.7150/thno.22717

Table 1.

Analysis of multiple factors associated with PET SUVmax

Variables N(%) SUVmax P value
Gender 0.216
Male 85(67.5) 14.65±5.61
Female 41(32.5) 13.52±6.86
Age 0.379
≥60 years 47(37.3) 14.95±7.01
<60 years 79(62.7) 13.89±5.32
Tumor Location 0.792
Proximal colon 48(38.1) 14.59±6.17
Distal colon 48(38.1) 14.38±6.30
rectum 30(23.8) 13.64±5.53
Differentiation 0.488
good 2(1.6) 9.45±3.32
moderate 70(55.5) 14.54±6.42
poor 54(42.9) 14.12±5.58
Clinical Staging 0.222
I 7(5.6) 9.93±3.47
II 36(28.6) 14.95±7.11
III 32(25.4) 13.89±5.41
IV 51(40.4) 14.65±5.75
T staging 0.334
1 3(2.4) 8.90±1.91
2 6(4.7) 12.32±3.84
3 39(31.0) 14.90±7.28
4 78(61.9) 14.33±5.51
N staging 0.581
Negative(N0) 53(42.1) 14.64±6.86
Positive(N1-3) 73(57.9) 14.02±5.40
M staging 0.546
Negative(M0) 75(59.5) 14.03±6.25
Positive(M1) 51(40.5) 14.65±5.75
Tumor Size 0.0001*
<5cm 64(50.8) 12.15±4.17
≥5cm 62(49.2) 16.48±6.86

Note: 126 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed. *: P < 0.05