Table 3.
Null model comparsiona |
Interaction |
Emotion |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stimulus | Time steps | χ2 | df | p | χ2 | df | p | χ2 | df | p |
Prosody | 0.5–1.5 | 9.86 | 5 | 0.079. | 2 | |||||
1.5–2.5 | 5.56 | 5 | 0.351 | |||||||
2.5–3.5 | 11.56 | 5 | 0.041∗ | 0.786 | 2 | 0.675 | 10.66 | 2 | 0.005∗∗ | |
3.5–4.5 | 11.82 | 5 | 0.037∗ | 1.63 | 2 | 0.444 | 9.108 | 2 | 0.011∗ | |
4.5–5.5 | 7.722 | 5 | 0.172 | |||||||
Sound | 0.5–1.5 | 1.74 | 2 | 0.419 | ||||||
1.5–2.5 | 4.29 | 2 | 0.117 | |||||||
2.5–3.5 | 6.95 | 2 | 0.031∗ | |||||||
3.5–4.5 | 12.81 | 2 | 0.002∗∗ | |||||||
4.5–5.5 | 6.07 | 2 | 0.048∗ |
aFor the sounds, the emotion effect is reflected by the null model comparison. Presented are the results of the model comparison for each time segments. Asterisks mark the significance level: ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.