Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6 Suppl 2):S131–S142. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.020

Table 1.

Characteristics and Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Antihypertensive Medicines Published in 1990–2016 (n=76)

Characteristics Number of studies
Location
 Europe 41
 North America (U.S. and Canada) 16
 Others 19
Medical conditions of study population
 HTN 39
 HTN+diabetes+renal disease 12
 HTN+diabetes 9
 HTN+renal failure 4
 HTN+cardiovascular disease 9
 HTN+cerebrovascular disease 3
Economic evaluation type
 Cost-minimization analysis 1
 Cost-effectiveness analysis 42
 Cost-utility analysis 17
 Cost-benefit analysis 2
 Cost-effectiveness and utility analysis 14
Perspectivea
 Health care 30
 Third-party payer 19
 Not specified payer 8
 Societal 7
 Others 4
 Not reported 10
Study framework
 Trial-based 28
 Model-based 24
 Trial- and model-based 24
Time horizonb
 ≤1 year 13
 >1 year and ≤10 years 38
 >10 years 35
 Not reported 3
Sensitivity analysis
 Conducted 64
 Not conducted 12
Treatment type
 Monotherapy 35
 Combination therapy 14
 Monotherapy and/or combination therapy 27
Outcomesc
 QALY 31
 LY 37
 Blood pressure reduction 8
 Cardiovascular disease-related 4
 Renal disease-related 7
 Monetary 2
 Others 6
Funding source
 Private industry 46
 Nonprofit organization 8
 Private industry+nonprofit organization 5
 None 5
 Not reported 12
Quality assessment scored
 >90 21
 81–90 33
 71–80 12
 ≤70 10
a

Two studies took two perspectives.

b

Eleven studies used more than two time horizons.

c

Seventeen studies assessed more than two outcomes.

d

The mean Quality of Health Economic Studies score was 82.5 (SD=13.8).

HTN, hypertension; LY, life year; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.