Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2016 Mar 2;91:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.089

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of candidate predictors of Gleason upgrade

Variables Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95% CI) P Value OR (95% CI) P Value
Age 0.986 (0.942, 1.032) .539 0.975 (0.922, 1.030) .363
Race 1.004 (0.461, 2.185) .993 0.790 (0.323, 1.935) .606
Prebiopsy PSA (ng/mL) 1.097 (1.005, 1.198) .037* 1.157 (1.039, 1.290) .008*
Prostate volume (mL) 0.995 (0.980, 1.010) .492 0.993 (0.966, 1.022) .639
Clinical stage (cT2 vs cT1) 0.393 (0.150, 1.029) .057 0.322 (0.109, 0.949) .040*
Number of biopsy cores (saturation vs 12-core) 0.784 (0.407, 1.512) .468 0.760 (0.340, 1.700) .505
No. of positive cores 1.144 (0.997, 1.313) .055 1.100 (0.915, 1.322) .313
Max cancer % of cores 1.011 (1.000, 1.023) .049* 1.009 (0.993, 1.025) .270

OR, odds ratio; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.

*

P < .05 considered statistically significant.