Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;27(1):e39–e54. doi: 10.1002/hec.3535

Table A4.

Summary statistics for 2008, by later P4P status

Ever PcV P4P Never PcV P4P p‐value of
Variable Mean SD Mean SD difference
share children (%) 11.6 (1.5) 10.6 (1.1) .072
share elderly (%) 17.0 (3.3) 18.5 (3.2) .178
log(population) 11.3 (1.3) 10.8 (1.3) .043
mean income 250.9 (40.0) 230.0 (15.8) .191
share secondary edu (%) 42.8 (6.4) 46.3 (5.4) .056
share tertiary edu (%) 33.3 (10.6) 28.5 (9.1) .074
other P4P a 0.05 (0.226) 0 (0) .001
choicereform a 0.42 (0.50) 0.05 (0.23) .330
cost responsibility a 0.15 (0.35) 0.80 (0.40) .000
Observations 108 181

County‐council level variable. Summary statistics for 2008, separate for the municipalities in counties that did ("ever") or did not ("never") introduce P4P tied to the PcV share during the period 2009–2013. PcV share = penicillin V prescriptions' share of total consumption of antibiotics prescribed for respiratory tract infections (J01CE02/J01AA02/J01CA04/J01CR02/J01DB‐DE/J01FA), children 0–6 years. Column p‐value of difference shows p‐values from regressions of each variable on a dummy for PcV P4P county council, that is, the p‐values of the difference between the treated group (Ever PcV P4P) and the control group (Never PcV P4P). The regressions are weighted by the square root of the population size and standard errors are clustered at the county council level. The difference between P4P and control counties is not statistically significant when contrasted in t‐tests at the county level (n = 21). PcV = penicillin V; P4P = pay‐for‐performance.