Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Oct 24;46(5):601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.10.006

Table 2. Feasibility Measures.

Subject evaluation of overall program, Nursing and Pharmacist Interventions and phone call frequency.

Question 6 month visit
(n=39)
12 month visit
(n=39)
Was the education session with the nurse helpful in your understanding and management of your gout? (1=Very helpful, 5=Not at all)
1 10 (25.6) 12 (30.8)
2 6 (15.4) 9 (23.1)
3 15 (38.5) 11 (28.2)
4 5 (12.8) 6 (15.4)
5 3 (7.7) 1 (2.6)
Were the calls from the pharmacist helpful in your management of gout? (1=Very much, 5=Too many)
1 7 (17.9) 7 (17.9)
2 3 (7.7) 8 (20.5)
3 13 (33.3) 3 (7.7)
4 4 (10.3) 7 (17.9)
5 12 (30.8) 14 (35.9)
Did you find the number of phone calls about the right number, too many or too few? (1=Too few, 5= Too many)
1 1 (2.6) 1 (2.6)
2 0 0
3 33 (84.6) 27 (69.2)
4 4 (10.3) 4 (10.3)
5 1 (2.6) 7 (17.9)
Please rate the usefulness of this program in helping you to understand gout and to be able to deal with the condition. (1=Extremely, 5=Not at all)
1 9 (23.1) 10 (25.6)
2 4 (10.3) 12 (30.3)
3 12 (30.8) 11 (28 2)
4 8 (20.5) 5 (12.8)
5 6 (15.4) 1 (2.6)
Did this program improve your ability to ask questions about your gout when you saw your doctor or nurse practitioner?
Yes 17 (43.6) 23 (59.0)
Would you recommend this program be further studied and considered for other people with gout?
Yes 38 (97.4) 35 (89.7)

Numbers are shown as count (percentage)