Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 25.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Catal. 2017 May 25;7(7):4441–4445. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01123

Table 1.

Evaluation of Chiral Copper Complexesa

graphic file with name nihms920083u2.jpg

entry ligand Cu source solvent NMR yield (%)b drb erc,d
1 L1 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 thf 87 6.7:1 77:23
2 L1 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene >98 4.6:1 82:18
3 L2 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene 98 1.7:1 92:8
4 L3 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene 88 1:1 95:5
5 L4 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene <2
6 L5 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene <2
7 L6 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene 12 11.5:1
8 L7 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene <2
9 L8 Cu(MeCN)4PF6 toluene >98 3.2:1 95:5
10 L8 CuOt-Bu toluene 87 3:1 95:5
11e L8 CuOt-Bu C6H6 >98 3.5:1 95.5:4.5

Ligands:
graphic file with name nihms920083t1.jpg
a

Reactions performed under N2 atmosphere.

b

Determined by analysis of 400 or 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of crude reactions with hexamethyldisiloxane as internal standard.

c

Determined by HPLC analysis; see the Supporting Information for details.

d

The er of the syn diastereoisomer is not reported due to its propensity to undergo elimination.

e

[0.167 M] in benzene with 2 equivalents of 1.