Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 24;47(1):202–216. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx217

Table 2.

Comparison of National Rivers Authority (NRFA) daily flow rates and predicted Topmodel Qt (saturated and overland flow). Cross-correlation functions were calculated on the residuals from the annually de-seasonalized models for NRFA and Qt estimates described in Eqn. 1. The table indicates the maximum CCF values calculated, and the lag (in days) for this maximum. NRFA gauging stations usually measured rivers that encompassed multiple upstream Topmodel subcatchments, and data from the latter were aggregated before comparison

NRFA station name NRFA code Max. CCF Lag (days) Upstream Topmodel subcatchments
River Tyne, Benwell 23001 0.528 4 1–13, 15, 20, 21, 24–30
North Tyne, Reaverhill 23003 0.522 4 1–8
South Tyne, Haydon Bridge 23004 0.463 4 9, 12, 21, 24, 25, 26–30
South Tyne, Featherstone 23006 0.353 4 25, 28–30
River Derwent 23007 0.184 4 23
River Rede 23008 0.429 2 2
Kielder Burn 23011 0.409 3 1
Team Valley 23017 0.177 1 14, 19, 22
North Tyne, Uglydubb 23022 0.365 7 1, 4, 5