Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2017 Apr 16;79(1):370–382. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26693

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Phantom study (a,c,e) linear correlation plots and (b,d,f) Bland-Altman plots. For the comparison between (a–b) radial R = 1 and design PDFF (described in the phantom design section of the methods), MD = −2.32% and LoA = MD ± 3.34%; (c–d) radial R = 1 PDFF and SVS PDFF, MD = 2.03% and LoA = MD ± 4.53%; and (e–f) radial R = 1 PDFF and Cartesian R = 4 PDFF, MD = 0.5% and LoA = MD ± 3.15%. The correlation coefficients ρ and ρc are statistically significant in all cases (P ≪ 0.01). The dashed lines represent y = x in the linear correlation plots and y = 0 in the Bland-Altman plots. LoA, limits of agreement; MD, mean difference; PDFF, proton-density fat fraction; SVS, single-voxel MR spectroscopy.