Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 5;10(1):e2029. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2029

Table 4. Student feedback on the PBL sessions (male group).

PBL: Problem based learning

p value: Probability value. Suggestive significance (p value: 0.05 < p < 0.10). * Moderately significant (p value: 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05). ** Highly significant (p value: p ≤ 0.01).

Student feedback on the PBL sessions Strongly disagree p value Disagree p value Agree to some extent p value Agree p value Strongly agree p value
Male (n=55) Male (n=55) Male (n=55) Male (n=55) Male (n=55)
PBL sessions helped me learn more about a topic than a regular lecture 3 (5.5%) 0.935 14 (25.5%) 0.945 16 (29.1%) 0.406 13 (23.6%) 0.059+ 9 (16.4%) 0.055+
I liked PBL since group discussions and presentations improved my ability to speak and communicate 2 (3.6%) 0.947 7 (12.7%) 0.128 11 (20%) 0.791 28 (50.9%) 0.639 7 (12.7%) 0.450
PBL improved my cognitive skills 2 (3.6%) 0.796 7 (12.7%) 0.204 12 (21.8%) 0.591 27 (49.1%) 0.822 7 (12.7%) 0.191
PBL is the best method to learn effectively 4 (7.3%) 0.092+ 5 (9.1%) 0.290 12 (21.8%) 0.406 30 (54.5%) 0.753 4 (7.3%) 0.241
PBL has no effect on my learning process 3 (5.5%) 0.016* 5 (9.1%) 0.095+ 12 (21.8%) 0.044+ 26 (47.3%) 0.054+ 9 (16.4%) 0.393
Post PBL presentation further improved knowledge on the subject 1 (1.8%) 0.645 2 (3.6%) 0.512 11 (20%) 0.907 25 (45.5%) 0.509 16 (29.1%) 0.771
I want PBL sessions alone 2 (3.6%) 0.238 10 (18.2%) 0.002** 18 (32.7%) 0.811 21 (38.2%) 0.077+ 4 (7.3%) 0.924
I want a hybrid of PBL and traditional teaching methods 3 (5.5%) 0.016* 10 (18.2%) 0.248 19 (34.5%) 0.713 19 (34.5%) 0.048* 4 (7.3%) 0.62
I want only traditional teaching 3 (5.5%) 0.225 3 (5.5%) 0.419 13 (23.6%) 0.614 21 (38.2%) 0.046* 15 (27.3%) 0.31
Were you satisfied with the intergroup interactions? 4 (7.3%) 0.522 7 (12.7%) 0.544 16 (29.1%) 0.021* 22 (40%) 0.068+ 6 (10.9%) 0.149
Were you happy with the number of students in a group? 0 (0%) 0.301 1 (1.8%) 0.963 10 (18.2%) 0.248 27 (49.1%) 0.559 17 (30.9%) 0.239