Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 20;32(Suppl 1):i106–i114. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw309

Table 5.

Condition-specific evaluation of the KDIGO guidelines by providers treating subtypes of NSa

SSNS (n = 19) SRNS (n = 16) MCD (n = 23) FSGS (n = 24) MN (n = 27)
Do guidelines reflect current management of specific condition
 Not at all consistent 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (8%) 0 (0%)
 Somewhat consistent 14 (74%) 14 (88%) 13 (57%) 16 (67%) 17 (63%)
 Completely consistent 5 (26%) 2 (13%) 10 (43%) 6 (25%) 10 (37%)
Guidelines are acceptable 11 (58%) 12 (70%) 17 (77%) 17 (71%) 20 (77%)
 If not acceptable, why? (Individual counts)
  Difference in prescribing practices from recommendations 3 4 2 3 1
  Availability of recommended therapeutic agents 4 1 0 0 2
  Concerns about efficacy of recommended therapy 4 3 2 4 4
  Concerns about side effects of recommended therapy 5 4 5 5 5
  Patient characteristics (comorbidity, older adults, ethnicity, etc.) 2 3 3 3 3
  Patient/family preference 3 0 1 1 1

n is the number of providers who cared for the disease subtype where SSNS is steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

SRNS, steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome; MCD, minimal change disease; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; MN, membranous nephropathy.

aNot all providers cared for all disease subtypes.