TABLE 3. Summary of studies of efficacy/effectiveness of HD-IIV3, aIIV3, and RIV4 compared with unadjuvanted SD-IIVs against laboratory-confirmed influenza among older adults*.
Comparator (proprietary name) | Study design | Ages enrolled | No. participants | Season(s) (predominant viruses)† | Location | Primary outcome | Main efficacy/effectiveness findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HD-IIV3 (Fluzone High-Dose, Sanofi Pasteur)
| |||||||
SD-IIV3 (Fluzone)§ |
RCT, double-blind |
≥65 years |
6,107 HD-IIV3
3,051 SD-IIV3 |
2009–10 ([H1N1]pdm09; not contained in HD-IIV3 or SD-IIV3) |
U.S. (99 sites) |
Culture- and/or RT-PCR-confirmed ILI, caused by types/subtypes similar to those contained in the vaccine |
Primary outcome not evaluable due to emergence of (H1N1)pdm09 pandemic (no cases meeting primary endpoint of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by viral types/subtypes similar to those in vaccine were observed; all confirmed cases were due to [H1N1]pdm09) |
SD-IIV3 (Fluzone)¶ |
RCT, double-blind |
≥65 years |
15,990 HD-IIV3
15,993 SD-IIV3 |
2011–12 (H3N2) and 2012–13 ([H3N2], mismatch) |
U.S., Canada (126 sites) |
Laboratory confirmed (culture- and/or RT-PCR) influenza caused by any influenza viral types or subtypes, in association with protocol-defined ILI |
Culture- and/or RT-PCR-confirmed influenza; any type or subtype, with protocol-defined ILI:
All influenza: RE 24.2% (95% CI = 9.7–36.5)
Influenza A: RE 24.0% (95% CI = 7.8–37.4)
Influenza B: RE 25.5% (95% CI =-15.7–52.4)
Culture- and/or RT-PCR-confirmed influenza; strains similar to vaccine, with protocol-defined ILI:
All influenza: RE 35.4% (95% CI = 12.5–52.5)
Influenza A: RE 31.7% (95% CI = 2.9–52.3)
Influenza B: RE 45.2% (95% CI = -2.2–71.5)
Culture-confirmed influenza; any type or subtype, with protocol-defined ILI:
All influenza: RE 23.1% (95% CI = 7.5–36.2)
Influenza A: RE 23.4% (95% CI = 6.0–37.6)
Influenza B: RE 21.7% (95% CI =-23.8–50.8)
Culture-confirmed influenza; strains similar to vaccine. with protocol-defined ILI: All influenza: RE 31.5% (95% CI = 4.6–51.1) Influenza A: RE 27.0% (95% CI = -8.5–51.2) Influenza B: RE 41.4% (95% CI =-10.3–69.8) |
RIV4 (Flublok Quadrivalent, Protein Sciences)
| |||||||
SD-IIV4 (Fluarix Quadrivalent)** |
RCT, double-blind |
≥50 years |
4,303 RIV4
4,301 IIV4 |
2014–15 (H3N2, mismatch) |
U.S. (40 sites) |
RT-PCR-confirmed ILI caused by any type or subtype. |
RT-PCR-positive protocol-defined ILI;
Aged ≥50 years:
All influenza: RE 30% (95% CI = 10–47)
Influenza A: RE 36% (95%CI = 14–53)
Influenza B: RE 4% (95% CI =: -72–46)
RT-PCR-positive protocol-defined ILI;
Aged 50 through 64 years:
All influenza: RE 42% (95% CI = 15–61)
Aged ≥65 years:
All influenza: RE 17% (95% CI = -20–43)
Culture-positive protocol-defined ILI:
Aged ≥50 years:
All influenza: RE 43% (95% CI = 21–59)
Influenza A: RE 44% (95% CI = 22–61)
Influenza B: RE 25% (95% CI =-121–75)
Culture-positive protocol-defined ILI: Aged 50–64 years: All influenza: RE 44% (95% CI = 10–65) Aged ≥65 years: All influenza: RE 42% (95% CI = 9–65) |
aIIV3 (Fluad, Seqirus)
| |||||||
SD-IIV3; unvaccinated†† | Nonrandomized, observational, prospective test negative case-control | ≥65 years, presenting with symptoms of ILI | 165 aIIV3 62 IIV3 55 unvaccinated | 2011–12 (H3N2) | Canada (3 health authorities) | RT-PCR- confirmed ILI |
Effectiveness of aIIV3 vs. unvaccinated: 58% (95% CI = 5–82) Effectiveness of IIV3 vs. unvaccinated: -2% (95% CI = -139–57) Relative effectiveness of aIIV3 vs. IIV3: 63% (95% CI = 4–86) |
Abbreviations: aIIV3=trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, adjuvanted; CI = confidence interval; ILI=influenza-like illness; HD-IIV3 = High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, trivalent ; RE=relative efficacy (compared to active comparator vaccine); RIV4 = Recombinant Influenza Vaccine, quadrivalent; SD-IIV3 = Standard-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, trivalent.
* Studies conducted among human participants of laboratory-confirmed (by viral culture and/or RT-PCR) influenza outcomes. Modeling and medical record database studies are not included in this Table, but are discussed in the Background Document.
† Information on predominant viruses is from U.S. national surveillance data (CDC, FluView, available at https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm).
§ Source: DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Jordanov E, Landolfi V, Denis M, Talbot HK. High-dose trivalent influenza vaccine compared to standard dose vaccine in elderly adults: safety, immunogenicity and relative efficacy during the 2009–2010 season. Vaccine 2013;31:861–6.
¶ Source: DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2014;371:635–45.
** Source: Dunkle LM, Izikson R, Patriarca P, et al.; PSC12 Study Team. Efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine in adults 50 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2427–36.
†† Source: Van Buynder PG, Konrad S, Van Buynder JL, et al. The comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the elderly. Vaccine 2013;31:6122–8.