Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2017 Mar;21(3):935–948. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1622-4

Table 2.

Characteristics of last sexual partner and last sexual event among male Mexican migrants by migration context and phase (N=1,219), Tijuana, Mexico, 2009–20101

Sending Communities Border Receiving Communities P2

Pre-departure (n=183) Return (n=161) Transit (n=179) Destination (n=414) Interception (n=282)
Last sexual partner’s characteristics
Gender and relationship, % 0.047
 • Female stable partner 81.9 68.9 71.3 71.3 74.4 (Ref)
 • Female casual partner 15.2 23.9 18.4 23.7 19.3
 • Female sex worker 1.9 2.6 9.9 * 4.0 5.8 *
 • Male partner (stable, casual, or sex worker) 1.1 4.6 0.4 1.0 0.5
Age, % 0.130
 • 25 or under 41.9 43.2 37.8 32.1 37.0 (Ref)
 • 26–35 35.9 30.4 38.7 39.3 39.9
 • 36–45 17.3 11.8 20.3 24.3 18.6
 • 46 or older 4.9 14.5 3.2 4.3 4.5
Indigenous ethnicity, % 2.3 6.4 0.1 ** 2.9 1.8 0.001
Country of origin, % <0.001
 • Mexico 97.9 89.0 98.4 65.8 64.4 (Ref)
 • U.S. 1.5 10.4 1.4 27.1 ** 28.6 **
 • Other countries 0.6 0.6 0.2 7.1 ** 7.0 **
Injection drug user, % 4.0 1.9 0.7 3.6 3.8 0.415
Partner’s HIV status, % 0.764
 • Sure/believe negative 72.5 76.5 71.4 68.1 74.3 (Ref)
 • Don’t know 27.6 23.5 28.1 31.8 25.7
 • Sure/believe positive 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0
Relationship history
Met the partner in, % <0.001
 • Mexico 99.9 84.4 Ref 92.5 34.5 36.5 (Ref)
 • U.S. 0.0 15.6 7.5 64.2 ** 63.4 **
 • Other countries 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.1
Where partner was met, % <0.001
 • At work/school 51.7 23.1 31.5 38.0 42.8 (Ref)
 • At a family/community/religious event/private house party 24.5 39.3 ** 31.6 33.8 22.7
 • At a bar or nightclub/a public area/other 23.9 37.6 ** 36.8 * 28.2 34.6
Through whom met partner, % 0.927
 • Family/friends/co-workers/other 46.9 52.8 55.1 47.1 55.3
 • Nobody 53.2 47.2 44.9 52.9 44.7
Time before first sexual encounter (months), Median (IQR) 12.2 (3.0–24.3) 8.0 (2.0–36.5) 6.0 * (2.0–12.2) 6.0 * (2.0–12.2) 6.0 (2.0–24.3) 0.025
Sex history with this partner (not mutually exclusive), %
 • Ever vaginal sex 97.8 95.4 97.8 96.7 98.8 0.434
 • Ever anal sex 14.6 20.6 13.3 23.3 24.7 0.271
 • Ever oral sex 45.0 26.7 47.3 56.7 46.1 0.389
Partner had other concurrent sexual partners, % 8.2 10.0 14.5 10.3 16.3 0.365
Risk during last sexual event
Sexual practice, % <0.001
 • Only vaginal sex 69.2 77.5 68.6 54.9 59.1 (Ref)
 • Only anal sex 1.5 4.6 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.4
 • Only oral sex 1.5 0.0 ** 1.1 1.2 0.9
 • Vaginal and anal, without oral sex 1.3 2.1 0.6 1.3 0.4
 • Vaginal and/or anal, with oral sex 26.5 15.9 29.8 42.6 * 35.4
Use condom consistently for vaginal and/or anal sex
  Overall, % 39.3 22.0 * 42.3 29.6 29.7 0.096
  With female stable partner, % 36.7 15.8 * 35.0 17.9 * 22.7 * 0.034
  With female casual partner, % 52.3 39.3 48.3 54.1 47.5 0.917
  With female sex worker, % 81.9 8.3 * 87.4 97.9 59.0 0.005
  With male partner, % 0.0 31.9 Ref 0.0 39.8 41.4 0.962
Context of last sexual event
Location of sexual encounter, % 0.410
 • Home 78.9 80.9 80.0 78.0 84.8 (Ref)
 • Hotel/motel 12.9 13.9 18.0 18.4 10.4
 • Car 4.3 3.7 1.6 2.3 1.6
 • Other places (e.g. jail, public place) 4.0 1.5 0.5 1.3 3.2
Consumed alcohol before/during the event, % 15.3 32.3 ** 23.1 32.3 ** 33.4 ** 0.014
Used illicit drugs before/during the event, % 0.2 9.0 ** 10.2 ** 6.2 ** 9.3 ** 0.007
1

Data represent behavior, partners, and context of last sexual event in the key migration context. This refers to the most recent migration context for which migrants were asked to report on their sexual partners, behaviors, and contexts. For pre-departure and return migrants, the context was the sending communities in Mexico; for transit migrants, the context was the border region; for destination and interception migrants, the context was the U.S.

2

P value for overall effect of migration phase, based on logistic (for binary outcomes), multinomial logistic (for categorical outcomes), and multiple linear (for continuous outcomes) regression models. All models were unadjusted. The referent migration phase was pre-departure unless otherwise indicated.

Ref: Reference group.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01 for comparison to the reference migration phase.