Table 2.
No. of participants | Mean age, yr | Clinical data | Methodological aspects | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Study | Patients/men | Controls/men | Patients | Controls | Diagnosis | Drug status | Illness duration, mo | PANSS, T/P/N | Task | Intensity | Slice thickness, mm | FWHM, mm | Correction step | Quality score |
Hofer et al27 | 10/NA | 10/NA | 30.9 | 29.2 | SCZ | drug-free† | 52.5 | 40/21.4/19.3 | RM | 1.5 T | 3 | 9 | Yes | 12 |
Jones et al49 | 7/6 | 8/6 | 28.4 | 27.2 | FES | drug-naive | NA | 79.1/NA/NA | VF | 1.5 T | 3 | 7.2 | NA | 9.5 |
Weiss et al50 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 29.5 | 26.89 | 6, FES | drug-free‡ | 28.25 | 72.25/20/17.01 | ST | 1.5 T | 3 | 8 | Yes | 11 |
Boksman et al51 | 10/9 | 10/9 | 22 | 23 | FES | drug-free§ | 17 | NA/NA/NA | WF | 4.0 T | 6 | 8 | Yes | 10.5 |
Scheuerecker et al29 | 23/19 | 23/19 | 31.6 | 32.6 | FES | drug-free¶ | 26.4 | NA/21.7/28.1 | WM | 1.5 T | 4 | 8 | Yes | 12 |
Scheef et al35 | 11/8 | 25/12 | 32 | 30 | 8, FES | drug-free** | NA | 43.1/20.2/21.4 | RS | 1.5 T | 8 | 12 | Yes | 11.5 |
De la Fuente-Sandoval et al52 | 12/10 | 13/10 | 23.6 | 26.1 | 6, FES | drug-free†† | 17 | 86.7/20.5/22.5 | PS | 3.0 T | 5 | 8 | Yes | 12 |
Nejad et al53 | 23/18 | 35/11 | 26.18 | 26.84 | FES | drug-naive | NA | 82.96/19.52/22.91 | WM | 3.0 T | 3 | 8 | Yes | 11.5 |
Ren et al31 | 100/41 | 100/41 | 24.3 | 24.39 | FES | drug-naive | 6.25 | 97.88/25.11/18.84 | RS | 3.0 T | 5 | 6 | Yes | 12 |
Bin et al54 | 15/9 | 15/8 | 26.27 | 24.73 | FES | drug-naive | 7.1 | 96.45/32.27/18.91 | AS | 1.5 T | 6 | 8 | No | 11 |
Hadley et al33 | 21/17 | 21/11 | 36 | 35.5 | 6, FES | drug-free‡‡ | 13.3 | NA/NA/NA | RS | 3.0 T | 4 | 6 | Yes | 11.5 |
Schlagenhauf et al55 | 24/22 | 24/22 | 27.5 | 27.2 | 15, FES | drug-free§§ | 28.8 | 85.6/22.2/21.6 | RL | 3.0 T | 4 | 8 | Yes | 12 |
Guo et al34 | 49/30 | 50/23 | 22.69 | 23.48 | FES | drug-naive | 22.45 | 91.31/22.27/22.82 | RS | 3.0 T | 4 | 8 | Yes | 12 |
Lesh et al56 | 23/18 | 37/27 | 20.2 | 19.7 | FES | drug-free¶¶ | 7 | NA/NA/NA | CPT | 1.5 T | 4 | 10 | Yes | 11.5 |
Zheng et al32 | 35/20 | 30/13 | 15.5 | 15.43 | FES | drug-naive | 6.6 | 74.62/20.42/20.91 | RS | 3.0 T | 4 | 6 | Yes | 12 |
Cui et al30 (1)* | 17/10 | 19/10 | 13.71 | 14.74 | FES | drug-naive | 6.51 | 106.24/31.12/25.53 | RS | 3.0 T | 4 | 4 | Yes | 12 |
Cui et al30 (2) | 15/8 | 19/10 | 13.4 | 14.71 | FES | drug-naive | 10.2 | 88.07/17.93/22.73 | RS | 3.0 T | 4 | 4 | Yes | 12 |
AS = auditory stimuli; CPT = Continuous Performance Task; FES = first-episode schizophrenia; FWHM = full width at half maximum; N = negative; NA = not available; P = positive; PANSS: Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale; PS = pain-tolerance stimuli; RL = Reversal Learning Task; RM = Warrington’s Recognition Memory Test; RS = resting state. SCZ = schizophrenia; ST = Stroop task; T = total; VF = verbal fluency; WF = word fluency; WM: working memory.
This study divided patients into 2 data sets according to different symptoms.
Except anxiolytics or benzodiazepine derivatives, which were paused on the day of the study, none of the patients received any psychotropic medication at the time of the study.
Six patients were neuroleptic-naive and 2 were experiencing an acute exacerbation of positive symptoms due to noncompliance with antipsychotic medication.
None of the patients had received antipsychotic medication, but 1 patient had received 20 mg of citalopram for 2 months that was stopped after 2 weeks.
Twenty patients were drug-naive, 3 patients were scanned after a wash-out period of 3 days.
Patients have not taken or have been taking medication for a minimum of 2 weeks.
Antipsychotic-free for at least 1 month.
All patients were off antipsychotic medications for at least 10 days.
The 15 first-episode patients were drug-naive; the remaining 9 received antipsychotic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics and had stopped for at least 3 weeks.
Seventeen were antipsychotic-naive and the remaining 5 had discontinued medication more than 1 month before the study.