Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;43(2):131–142. doi: 10.1503/jpn.160219

Table 2.

Demographics and clinical characteristics from functional studies included in the meta-analysis

No. of participants Mean age, yr Clinical data Methodological aspects




Study Patients/men Controls/men Patients Controls Diagnosis Drug status Illness duration, mo PANSS, T/P/N Task Intensity Slice thickness, mm FWHM, mm Correction step Quality score
Hofer et al27 10/NA 10/NA 30.9 29.2 SCZ drug-free 52.5 40/21.4/19.3 RM 1.5 T 3 9 Yes 12
Jones et al49 7/6 8/6 28.4 27.2 FES drug-naive NA 79.1/NA/NA VF 1.5 T 3 7.2 NA 9.5
Weiss et al50 8/8 8/8 29.5 26.89 6, FES drug-free 28.25 72.25/20/17.01 ST 1.5 T 3 8 Yes 11
Boksman et al51 10/9 10/9 22 23 FES drug-free§ 17 NA/NA/NA WF 4.0 T 6 8 Yes 10.5
Scheuerecker et al29 23/19 23/19 31.6 32.6 FES drug-free 26.4 NA/21.7/28.1 WM 1.5 T 4 8 Yes 12
Scheef et al35 11/8 25/12 32 30 8, FES drug-free** NA 43.1/20.2/21.4 RS 1.5 T 8 12 Yes 11.5
De la Fuente-Sandoval et al52 12/10 13/10 23.6 26.1 6, FES drug-free†† 17 86.7/20.5/22.5 PS 3.0 T 5 8 Yes 12
Nejad et al53 23/18 35/11 26.18 26.84 FES drug-naive NA 82.96/19.52/22.91 WM 3.0 T 3 8 Yes 11.5
Ren et al31 100/41 100/41 24.3 24.39 FES drug-naive 6.25 97.88/25.11/18.84 RS 3.0 T 5 6 Yes 12
Bin et al54 15/9 15/8 26.27 24.73 FES drug-naive 7.1 96.45/32.27/18.91 AS 1.5 T 6 8 No 11
Hadley et al33 21/17 21/11 36 35.5 6, FES drug-free‡‡ 13.3 NA/NA/NA RS 3.0 T 4 6 Yes 11.5
Schlagenhauf et al55 24/22 24/22 27.5 27.2 15, FES drug-free§§ 28.8 85.6/22.2/21.6 RL 3.0 T 4 8 Yes 12
Guo et al34 49/30 50/23 22.69 23.48 FES drug-naive 22.45 91.31/22.27/22.82 RS 3.0 T 4 8 Yes 12
Lesh et al56 23/18 37/27 20.2 19.7 FES drug-free¶¶ 7 NA/NA/NA CPT 1.5 T 4 10 Yes 11.5
Zheng et al32 35/20 30/13 15.5 15.43 FES drug-naive 6.6 74.62/20.42/20.91 RS 3.0 T 4 6 Yes 12
Cui et al30 (1)* 17/10 19/10 13.71 14.74 FES drug-naive 6.51 106.24/31.12/25.53 RS 3.0 T 4 4 Yes 12
Cui et al30 (2) 15/8 19/10 13.4 14.71 FES drug-naive 10.2 88.07/17.93/22.73 RS 3.0 T 4 4 Yes 12

AS = auditory stimuli; CPT = Continuous Performance Task; FES = first-episode schizophrenia; FWHM = full width at half maximum; N = negative; NA = not available; P = positive; PANSS: Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale; PS = pain-tolerance stimuli; RL = Reversal Learning Task; RM = Warrington’s Recognition Memory Test; RS = resting state. SCZ = schizophrenia; ST = Stroop task; T = total; VF = verbal fluency; WF = word fluency; WM: working memory.

*

This study divided patients into 2 data sets according to different symptoms.

Except anxiolytics or benzodiazepine derivatives, which were paused on the day of the study, none of the patients received any psychotropic medication at the time of the study.

Six patients were neuroleptic-naive and 2 were experiencing an acute exacerbation of positive symptoms due to noncompliance with antipsychotic medication.

§

None of the patients had received antipsychotic medication, but 1 patient had received 20 mg of citalopram for 2 months that was stopped after 2 weeks.

Twenty patients were drug-naive, 3 patients were scanned after a wash-out period of 3 days.

**

Patients have not taken or have been taking medication for a minimum of 2 weeks.

††

Antipsychotic-free for at least 1 month.

‡‡

All patients were off antipsychotic medications for at least 10 days.

§§

The 15 first-episode patients were drug-naive; the remaining 9 received antipsychotic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics and had stopped for at least 3 weeks.

¶¶

Seventeen were antipsychotic-naive and the remaining 5 had discontinued medication more than 1 month before the study.