Table 2.
Participant ID | No- feedback | Reward | Punishment | Total payment amount (NTD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 800 | +220 | -180 | 840 |
2 | 800 | +180 | -340 | 640 |
3 | 800 | +160 | -330 | 630 |
4 | 800 | +310 | -250 | 860 |
5 | 800 | +80 | -400 | 480 |
6 | 800 | +290 | -140 | 950 |
7 | 800 | +320 | -260 | 860 |
8 | 800 | +280 | -120 | 960 |
9 | 800 | +370 | -130 | 1040 |
10 | 800 | +210 | -300 | 710 |
11 | 800 | +290 | -310 | 780 |
12 | 800 | +310 | -180 | 930 |
13 | 800 | +360 | -160 | 1000 |
14 | 800 | +320 | -110 | 1010 |
15 | 800 | +180 | -390 | 590 |
16 | 800 | +250 | -170 | 880 |
17 | 800 | +350 | -130 | 1020 |
18 | 800 | +240 | -200 | 840 |
19 | 800 | +360 | -130 | 1030 |
20 | 800 | +320 | -180 | 940 |
Average ± SD | 800 | +270 ± 78.13 | -221 ± 94.28 | 849 ± 163 |
In reward, the participants earned more money than the punishment condition.