Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;8(5):2901–2910. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3823

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plots of meta‐analyses (corresponds to Table 2) of the biomass yield in the four different measurement temperatures (a) fluctuating (2 hr 20°C, 2 hr 30°C, 2 hr 40°C) (b) constant 20°C (c) constant 30°C (d) constant 40°C for all studied species. If effect sizes are higher than zero, it indicates a better performance of clones adapted to fluctuating temperature than clones adapted to constant (30°C) temperature. Effect sizes and their confidence intervals (±95%) are denoted in the right‐hand side of the figure. RE model indicates estimate for random effect meta‐analysis model. Different sized symbols denote the magnitude of weighing (larger more weight, smaller less)