Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;8(4):603–608. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1566

Table I.

Characteristics of the eligible studies.

Authors Year Origin Study design Patient no. (M/F) Age (range or mean, years) Tumor stage Analysis method (Refs.)
Goh and Lerner 2008 USA Retro 32 (25/7) 59 (49,84) Ta, T1, T2 OCT (12)
Gladkova et al 2013 Russia NR 26 (18/8) 64.7 (3479) CIS, Ta, T1, T2 Cross-polarization OCT (22)
Wang et al 2006 USA Retro >20 NR T1, T2a OCT (23)
Schmidbauer et al 2009 Austria Prosp 66 (49/17) 67 (38–84) CIS, Ta, T1, T2 OCT (20)
Ren et al 2009 USA NR 56 (46/10) 70 (25–75) pTis and pTa-pT1 Cystoscopic OCT (19)
Manyak et al 2005 USA NR 24 NR Papillary and flat lesions OCT (4)
Lingley-Papadopoulos et al 2009 USA NR 21 NR CIS, papillary lesion, or invasive tumor OCT (24)
Karl et al 2010 Germany NR 52 21–91 CIS, Ta, T1, T2 OCT (18)
Hermes et al 2008 Germany Retro 105 NR CIS, invasive carcinoma Ultrahigh resolution OCT (17)

Ta, Tis and T1 are classed as superficial bladder cancers. Prosp, prospective; Retro, retrospective; M, male; F, female; NR, not reported; CIS, carcinoma in situ; Ta, Tis, tumors confined to the mucosa; T1, submucosa; T2, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; OCT, optical coherence tomography.