Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;31(3):403–409. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0718

Table 4.

Comparative effects of lipid-coated ZnO (Shield Zn [SZ]) vs uncoated ZnO on gene expressions in the jejunal mucosa of weanling pigs

Variable ZnO1) SZ1) SEM p-value



100 (NC) 2,500 (PC) 100 200 400 Contrast Regression3)


NC2) PC2) L Q
IGF-I 1.00 2.09 0.58 1.27 2.21 0.54 0.572 0.248 0.003 0.004
ZO-1 1.00 3.59 1.16 2.03 3.01 1.39 0.511 0.351 0.142 0.157
Occludin 1.00 1.99 0.95 0.53 0.72 0.39 0.562 0.009 0.605 0.743
TNF-α 1.00 1.70 0.39 1.17 1.33 0.56 0.951 0.261 0.163 0.210
IL-6 1.00 1.28 2.31 0.99 0.65 0.38 0.477 0.929 0.017 0.033
IL-10 1.00 2.87 0.37 1.12 1.92 0.99 0.906 0.141 0.053 0.062
TGF-β1 1.00 2.52 0.87 1.07 1.47 0.36 0.740 0.002 0.119 0.123

NC, negative control; PC, positive control; SEM, standard error of mean; L, linear; Q, quadratic; IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor-I; ZO-1, zonula occludens protein-1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, interleukin-6; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1.

1)

The numeral under the column heading indicates the dietary Zn concentration in mg/kg provided by the Zn supplement. Data are the means of 8 piglets.

2)

Total SZ (SZ-100, -200, and -400) vs. NC and total SZ vs PC, respectively.

3)

Linear and quadratic regressions on the dietary SZ concentration within the total SZ group piglets were analyzed separately.