Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 27;75(2):158–166. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4040

Table 2. Frequency of Adverse Events at Least Remotely Associated With Interventiona.

Adverse Event Week 2 Week 6
No. (%) P Valueb No. (%) P Valueb
Sham
(n = 26)
Active
(n = 27)
Sham
(n = 26)
Active
(n = 26)
Headache 12 (46) 8 (30) .21 6 (23) 8 (31) .53
Neck pain 1 (4) 1 (4) >.99 0 1 (4) .32
Discomfort, left side 5 (19) 7 (26) .56 3 (12) 5 (19) >.99
Discomfort, right side 5 (19) 7 (26) .56 4 (15) 5 (19) >.99
Tingling 15 (58) 15 (56) .87 12 (46) 14 (54) .57
Itching 2 (9) 7 (28) .14 2 (8) 8 (31) .07
Burning 7 (30) 11 (44) .33 4 (15) 8 (31) .32
Skin redness 5 (19) 11 (41) .08 5 (19) 14 (54) .01
Sleepiness 10 (38) 9 (33) .69 9 (35) 6 (23) .35
Trouble concentrating 1 (4) 1 (4) >.99 0 1 (4) >.99
Fatigue 1 (4) 0 .47 2 (8) 1 (4) >.99
Nausea 3 (13) 2 (8) .66 2 (8) 1 (4) >.99
Dizziness 2 (9) 2 (8) >.99 0 2 (8) .49
TEAS episode NA NA NA 5 (19) 4 (15) .71

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable; TEAS, treatment-emergent affective switch.

a

Adverse events were assessed using a commonly used tDCS questionnaire. At the end of weeks 2 and 6, all participants were asked to complete these questionnaires, describing the presence of an adverse event, its severity (mild, moderate, or severe), and its relationship to the treatment (1, none; 2, remote; 3, possible; 4, probable; or 5, certain).

b

P values were determined with χ2or Fisher exact test.