Table 3. Correlations Between Visual Acuity and Optical Coherence Tomography–Derived Linear Variablesa.
Unadjusted | Adjusted for RTF | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B (95%CI) | P Value | B (95%CI) | P Value |
RTF per 100 μm | −2.4 (−4.0 to −0.7) | .005b | NA | NA |
MRT per 100 μm | −0.04 (−0.08 to −0.01) | .01b | −13.1 (−19.6 to −6.6) | <.001b |
Average global DRIL per 100 μm | −4.6 (−8.0 to −1.3) | .009b | −4.7 (−7.9 to −1.4) | .006b |
ELM disruption at fovea per 100 μm | −0.4 (−0.8 to −0.1) | .01b | −0.5 (−0.9 to −0.1) | .01b |
EZ disruption at fovea per 100 μm | −0.4 (−0.7 to −0.1) | .003b | −0.4 (−0.7 to −0.1) | .008b |
Abbreviations: DRIL, disorganization of inner retinal layers; ELM, external limiting membrane; EZ, ellipsoid zone; MRT, maximum retinal thickness; NA, not applicable; RTF, retinal thickness at fovea.
Results are reported from general linear regression model.
Statistically significant (P < .05).