Table 4.
Estimation of τ and PP from centromeric loci of the nine LGs of tetraploid ‘Mexican’ lime
| LG | Locus | DC | Mic/Mic | Med/Mic | Med/Med | τ | PP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cibe5720 | 2.21 | 1 | 79 | 5 | 0.210 | 0.790 |
| 2 | 2P25198777 | 10.73 | 1 | 81 | 3 | 0.140 | 0.860 |
| 3 | JI-TC01 | 19.09 | 1 | 78 | 6 | 0.245 | 0.755 |
| 4 | mCrCIR07D06 | 0.19 | 3 | 79 | 3 | 0.210 | 0.790 |
| 5 | mCrCIR07G11 | 2.93 | 7 | 71 | 7 | 0.495 | 0.505 |
| 6 | 6P7496245 | 0.10 | 4 | 76 | 5 | 0.320 | 0.680 |
| 7 | mCrCIR03B07 | 13.04 | 0 | 84 | 1 | 0.035 | 0.965 |
| 8 | CiBE0214 | 13.80 | 0 | 84 | 1 | 0.035 | 0.965 |
| 9 | JI-TCT01 | 0.64 | 0 | 78 | 7 | 0.245 | 0.755 |
LG, linkage group; DC, distance to the centromere [from reference genetic map data (Ollitrault et al. 2012b) and location of centromere (Aleza et al. 2015)]; Med/Med, Med/Mic and Mic/Mic, number of individuals with such allelic configuration; τ, tetrasomic rate; PP, preferential pairing.