Table VII.

Table VIIa1. Mean number of drinks on average day: TLFB and AUDIT – C. (r=.436, p<.001, Kendall tau_b)
	Mean	SD	Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (Kendall’s W)	p
TLFB – mean number of drinks on an average day	3.42	1.85	Kendall’s W= 0.76 Indicating low level of discordance high level of concordance	0.001
AUDIT C – number of drinks at a time on a typical drinking day	1.90	0.83

Table VIIa2. Binge drinkers (6 or more) in TLFB and AUDIT-C measure of binge drinking (how often have you had six or more drinks at a sitting in AUDIT C (Sig.< .001)
	Mean	SD	Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (Kendall’s W)	p
TLFB – binge drinkers (6 or more binge)	0.73	3.54	Kendall’s W= 0.79 Indicating that low level of discordance and high level of concordance	0.001
AUDIT C – how often have you had six or more drinks at a sitting	1.45	0.83

Table VIIb. Correlation between 4 day and 7-day non-adherence in TLFB and 4 day and 7-day non-adherence in TLFB and survey general survey (Sig. <.001)
4 day-non-adherence
TLFB	7.48	1.44	Kendall’s W= 0.976 indicating high level of concordance	0.001
General survey	0.92	0.26
7 day-non-adherence				0.001
TLFB	13.22	2.16	Kendall’s W= 0.896 indicating high level of concordance
General survey	0.66	2.20

Table VIIc. Correlation between Unprotected Sex Ratio**: TLFB and Survey (Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
TLFB – total number of times of unprotected sex all partners, past 30 days*	11.38	23.72	Kendall’s W= 0.001 indicating highest level of discordance and low level of concordance	0.674
Survey – total number of times had sex unprotected all partners past 30 day*	12.77	43.59

^**Risky sex was annualized (12 months) given discrepancies in timing of question on risky sex among wife regular partners and other partners