Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Nov 29;235(3):761–770. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4791-6

Table I.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of rare/never drinkers and drinkers

MEN (n = 168) Rare/never drinkers (n = 72) Moderate Drinkers (n = 61) Heavy Drinkers (n = 35) Drinking effect p-value
Age, years (SD) 83.1 (8.0) 81.4 (8.3) 80.6 (6.9) 0.23
Education, years (SD) 15.2 (3.0) 16.0 (2.3) 16.3 (3.4) 0.15
MMSE score (SD) 28.3 (1.5) 28.2 (1.5) 28.2 (1.7) 0.96
Caucasian, % (n) 94% (68) 98% (60) 86% (30) 0.0401
Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score (SD) 20.7 (3.3) 19.9 (3.3) 19.7 (2.75) 0.54
ApoE4, # (%) 12 (16.7%) 14 (23.0%) 6 (17.1%) 0.53
BMI (kg/m2) 26.4 (3.7) 25.4 (2.8) 26.9 (4.0) 0.11
Diabetic, % (n) 12.5% (9) 9.8% (6) 8.5% (3) 0.85
Hypertensive, % (n) 51.3% (37) 57.4% (35) 65.7% (23) 0.39
Reported # of drinks weekly - 5.2 (2.5) 14.2 (7.5) <0.001
WOMEN (n = 318) Rare/never drinkers (n = 183) Moderate Drinkers (n = 85) Heavy Drinkers (n = 50) Drinking effect p-value
Age, years (SD) 83.7 (6.6) 83.9 (6.5) 79.0 (8.4) 0.0022
Education, years (SD) 14.2 (2.5) 14.8 (2.4) 15.4 (2.8) .0113
MMSE score (SD) 28.4 (1.6) 28.5 (1.4) 28.9 (1.2) 0.10
Caucasian, % (n) 92% (168) 92% (78) 90% (45) 0.91
Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score (SD) 20.4 (3.4) 20.4 (3.5) 20.5 (3.6) 0.99
ApoE4, # (%) 27 (14.8%) 21 (24.7%) 15 (30.0%) 0.0244
BMI (kg/m2) 26.0 (4.9) 25.7 (4.6) 25.7 (4.9) 0.86
Diabetic, % (n) 10.9% (20) 9.4% (8) 14.0% (7) 0.70
Hypertensive, % (n) 61.7% (113) 70.6% (60) 68.0% (34) 0.34
Reported # of drinks weekly - 4.7 (1.9) 15.7 (6.4) <0.001

4 (5.6%) of the rare/never drinkers did not have ApoE4 genotype identified.

7 (11.5%) of the moderate drinkers did not have ApoE4 genotype identified.

5 (14.3%) of the heavy drinkers did not have their ApoE4 genotype identified.

1

significant contrast between heavy drinkers and moderate drinkers (p=0.023)

12 (6.66%) of the rare/never drinkers did not have ApoE4 genotype identified.

7 (8.3%) of the drinkers did not have ApoE4 gene identified.

2 (4.0%) of the heavy drinkers did not have ApoE4 gene identified

2

significant contrasts between heavy drinkers and both moderate drinkers and rare/never drinkers (p<0.001)

3

significant contrast between heavy drinkers and rare/never drinkers (p=0.005)

4

significant contrast between heavy drinkers and rare/never drinkers (p=0.028)

Data are presented as means (Standard Deviation; SD) unless otherwise indicated.

Statistical comparisons were made using one-way ANOVAs, with the exception of race/Caucasian and ApoE4, which were determined with the Fisher test. Specific contrasts between drinking groups were evaluated with pairwise t-tests and pairwise Fisher tests respectively