Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Mar;22(3):774–790. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1601-9

Table 2.

HIV Care engagement by relationship and partnership status (Single, concordant-positive, discordant) among young Black men who have sex with men living with hiv in Dallas and Houston, Texas, 2009–2014

Outcome Total n (% Yes) By partnership status Simple logistic regression


n % Yes OR 95 % CI p
Have a regular healthcare providera 349 (88.2) Single 171 81.3 1.00
Concordant 105 91.4 2.46 1.12–5.38 .05
Discordant 73 91.8 2.57 1.03–6.45 .05
Currently receiving hiv careb 350 (83.7) Single 171 76.6 1.00
Concordant 106 86.8 2.01 1.03–3.90 .05
Discordant 73 87.7 2.17 0.99–4.75 .10
Ever received ARTc 350 (69.3) Single 171 60.8 1.00
Concordant 106 74.5 1.89 1.11–3.22 .05
Discordant 73 72.6 1.71 0.94–3.11 .10
Currently receiving ARTd 236 (68.6) Single 104 86.5 1.00
Concordant 79 57.0 0.21 0.10–0.42 .001
Discordant 53 62.3 0.26 0.12–0.57 .01
ART Adherence (No Missed Doses past 30 days)e 168 (54.1) Single 90 51.1 1.00
Concordant 45 44.4 0.77 0.37–1.57 ns
Discordant 33 66.7 1.91 0.83–4.40 ns

n may be less than 352 due to missing data by survey item

OR odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ART antiretroviral therapy

a

Discordant versus concordant 1.05 (0.36–3.08)

b

Discordant versus concordant 1.08 (0.44–2.65)

c

Discordant versus concordant 0.91 (0.46–1.78)

d

Discordant versus concordant 1.25 (0.61–2.54)

e

Discordant versus concordant 0.54 (0.98–6.35)