Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Mar;22(3):774–790. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1601-9

Table 4.

Bivariate, multivariable analyses of having a regular healthcare provider and partnership status among young, Black men who have sex with men living with HIV in Dallas and Houston, Texas, 2009–2014

Variable Category N Bivariatea Multivariableb


% Yes p AOR 95 % CI
Relational
 Partnership status 0.006
Single 171 81.3 1.00
In a relationship 178 91.6 2.58 1.20–5.54
Individual
 City 0.715
Dallas 173 87.3 1.00
Houston 178 86.0 0.70 0.33–1.48
 Survey 0.679
2009 51 84.3 1.00
2010 66 83.3 0.83 0.24–2.80
2011 55 83.6 1.03 0.29–3.67
2012 59 88.1 1.57 0.40–6.27
2013 58 87.9 1.10 0.30–4.06
2014 62 91.9 1.96 0.47–8.21
Age (years) 0.439
18–20 30 83.3 1.00
21–23 104 82.7 1.08 0.29–3.96
24–26 106 89.6 1.81 0.44–7.36
27–29 111 88.3 1.27 0.31–5.26
 Time since HIV diagnosis 0.580
0–12 months 111 87.4 1.00
13–24 months 47 87.2 0.95 0.31–2.94
25–60 months 104 85.6 0.59 0.25–1.42
> 5 years 76 92.1 1.47 0.48–4.50
Sociostructural
 Educational attainment 0.183
< Grade 12 70 80.0 1.00
Grade 12 102 87.3 1.64 0.55–4.89
> Grade 12 175 89.1 1.30 0.47–3.61
 Employment status 0.048
Full-time 176 90.9 1.00
Part-time 67 83.6 0.60 0.22–1.68
Unemployed/disabled 106 81.1 0.63 0.24–1.66
 Annual income 0.465
< $10,000 117 84.6 1.00
$10,000–$19,999 49 87.8 0.82 0.25–2.75
$20,000–$39,999 109 84.4 0.52 0.19–1.39
$40,000 or more 71 91.5 0.73 0.19–2.76
 Incarceration 0.068
In the past year 69 78.3 1.00
> 1 year ago 49 83.7 0.84 0.27–2.64
Never 224 89.3 2.46 0.95–6.38
 Homelessness 0.341
In the past year 49 85.7 1.00
> 1 year ago 31 77.4 0.35 0.08–1.44
Never 265 87.5 0.93 0.30–2.89
 Sexual orientation 0.685
Gay-identified 284 87.0 1.00
Other-identified 67 85.1 1.39 0.51–3.78
Total 351 86.6

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

a

P-value is for χ2 statistic for omnibus test assessing relationship between variable and outcome in a simple logistic regression analysis

b

AOR with 95 % CI (N = 325, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test p-value = 0.34)