Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biophotonics. 2017 Oct 29;11(3):10.1002/jbio.201700078. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700078

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of hyperspectral reflectance imaging, autofluorescence imaging, 2-NBDG fluorescence imaging and proflavine fluorescence imaging for the distinction of non-neoplastic and neoplastic tissue of ex vivo tongue and the diagnostic performance of hyperspectral reflectance imaging and autofluorescence imaging of in vivo tongue

Imaging Method AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
In Vivo HSI 0.84±0.05 78%±5% 78%±5% 78%±5%
Autofluorescence 0.84±0.06 78%±5% 78%±4% 77%±9%
Autofluorescence(R/G) 0.43±0.10 48%±6% 48%±6% 47%±12%

Ex Vivo 2-NBDG 0.91±0.04 84%±3% 85%±3% 84%±6%
Proflavine 0.89±0.03 82%±3% 83%±3% 81%±5%
HSI 0.86±0.06 79%±6% 79%±7% 79%±5%
Autofluorescence 0.87±0.03 80%±4% 80%±6% 81%±3%
Autofluorescence(R/G) 0.49±0.19 50%±14% 50%±17% 54%±12%
2-NBDG (Mean) 0.75±0.23 70%±17% 70%±18% 71%±19%
Proflavine (Std) 0.49±0.15 54%±9% 56%±12% 49%±20%