Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2017 Oct 9;36(2):682–691. doi: 10.1002/jor.23727

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Periosteal bone formation was not affected by cycle number (p > 0.05, ANOVA). Each of these three groups had a significant increase in bone formation in loaded vs. control tibias. Tibias in these groups (Groups 6, 5 and 3) were loaded to −1800 με, 5 days/wk for 2 weeks. Bars depict mean ± SD for the loaded (right) tibia; dashed line indicates mean value for control tibias of these groups.

^ p < 0.05, Right vs. Left