Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):784–797. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1395-5

Figure 1. Potential phonemic ambiguity in the acoustic-phonetic realization of consonant stimuli.

Figure 1

Each panel illustrates the mean spectrotemporal difference between stimulus pairs across talkers in the consonant conditions, aligned to the onset of voicing in each stimulus. Dark shading shows greater absolute difference between stimuli. In the low-ambiguity condition, /saɪ/ and /baɪ/ differ in terms of manner, place, and voicing, and corresponding spectrotemporal differences can be seen in the high frequency energy associated with the frication of /s/ and differences in the formant frequencies at the onset of voicing. In the medium-ambiguity condition, /thaɪ/ and /baɪ/ differ in terms of place and voicing, and corresponding acoustic-phonetic differences reveal differences in aspiration and onset formant frequencies. In the high-ambiguity condition, /phaɪ/ and /baɪ/ differ only in terms of voicing, as evident in the energy differences related to aspiration during voice onset time.