Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0961-3

Table 1.

Histological validation of ECV by modality

Reference Year Population Number Finding
ECV by CMR
 Flett et al. [15] 2010 AS/HCM 26 Strong correlation with histological fibrosis in AS (r2 = 0.86) and HCM (r2 = 0.62).
 White et al. [21] 2013 AS 18 Bolus only and infusion ECV measurements correlated with histological CVF (r2 = 0.69 and 0.71).
 Miller et al. [17] 2013 DCM/IHD (transplant) 6 Significant linear relationship with histological CVF using either the 10- or 15-min post-contrast T1 (p < 0.001).
 De Meester et al. [16] 2015 AS/AR/MR 31 Strong correlation with the magnitude of histological fibrosis (r = 0.78).
 Kammerlander et al. [18] 2016 Mixed HF 36 Significant correlation with histological CVF (r = 0.493).
 Lurz et al. [19] 2016 Myocarditis 129 ECV adequately estimated the degree of LV fibrosis percentage only in patients without inflammation (r = 0.72) and not in those with inflammation (r = 0.24).
ECV by CT
 Bandula et al. [34] 2013 AS 23 Strong correlation with histological measures of fibrosis (r = 0.71).
 Yoon et al. [43] 2015 Hepatic fibrosis 141 Significant correlation with histological hepatic fibrosis staging (r = 0.493).

AS aortic stenosis, AR aortic regurgitation, CVF collagen volume fraction, DCM dilated cardiomyopathy, HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, HF heart failure, IHD ischemic heart disease, MR mitral regurgitation