Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;40(1):126–134. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0575-7

Table 2.

Mean number of drug-associated symptoms at follow-up

Intervention N = 78 Control N = 67 Differences between groups (IG vs. CG)
DAS, mean number per patient (total number) (primary outcome) 4.0 (313) 5.0 (333) Incidence rate ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.62–1.33a
DAS persisting at follow-up, mean number per patient (total number) 2.2 (171) 2.6 (174) Incidence rate ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.55–1.30a
Number of patients reporting at least one DAS (%) 56 (72) 51 (76) Odds ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.38–1.88b

DAS drug-associated symptoms, IG intervention group, CG control group, CI confidence interval

aNegative-binomial log linear regression analysis adjusted for number of DAS at baseline, sex, age and number of drugs in use at baseline

bLogistic regression analysis adjusted for differences at baseline, sex, age and number of drugs in use at baseline