Table 2.
Mean number of drug-associated symptoms at follow-up
| Intervention N = 78 | Control N = 67 | Differences between groups (IG vs. CG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAS, mean number per patient (total number) (primary outcome) | 4.0 (313) | 5.0 (333) | Incidence rate ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.62–1.33a |
| DAS persisting at follow-up, mean number per patient (total number) | 2.2 (171) | 2.6 (174) | Incidence rate ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.55–1.30a |
| Number of patients reporting at least one DAS (%) | 56 (72) | 51 (76) | Odds ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.38–1.88b |
DAS drug-associated symptoms, IG intervention group, CG control group, CI confidence interval
aNegative-binomial log linear regression analysis adjusted for number of DAS at baseline, sex, age and number of drugs in use at baseline
bLogistic regression analysis adjusted for differences at baseline, sex, age and number of drugs in use at baseline