Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;20(2):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9230

Table 2.

Distribution of included studies according to main uses of social media (N=47).

Main use and types of social mediaa,b Number of studies Studies
Intervention studies



Promoting behavior change



Blogs or microblogs 8 [18,37,50,54,55,58,72,76]


Discussion forums 15 [37,42-44,48,52,56,59,60,63,66,75,79,87,88]


Social networking sites 8 [37,41,54,64,72,84,92,93]


Virtual worlds 3 [77,82,83]

Professional dietetic education



Collaborative projects 1 [40]


Discussion forums 2 [78,80]


Virtual worlds 1 [47]
Descriptive studies



Promoting behavior change



Blogs or microblogs 3 [35,38,86]


Social networking sites 1 [39]
Content analysis studies



Overview of social media content



Blogs or microblogs 2 [49,61]
Expert opinion papers



Professional dietetic practice



All social media 4 [19,34,36,74]


All social networking sites 1 [53]


Content communities 1 [73]


Discussion forums 1 [81]

aAll social networking sites” refers to social networking sites that could be used for dietetic professional networking, such as LinkedIn and Facebook, as described by Graham 2009 [53]; “all social media” refers to all social media platforms (ie, blogs/microblogs, discussion forms, social networking sites, collaborative projects, content communities, and virtual worlds).

bThere was a possibility of multiple social media platforms per study: the Social Mobile Approaches to Reduce weighT (SMART) study. SMART study [51,72] included a social networking site (Facebook) and a blog; the study described in Baghaei 2011 [37] included a study designed social networking site entitled SOcial Families, a blog, and a discussion forum; and the study described in Hales (2014) [54] and Turner-McGrievy (2014) [84] included a social networking site (Facebook) and a microblog (Twitter).