Table 4. Number of host-seeking mosquitoes caught indoors in local households with push-pull and control households.
| Variables | Descriptions | N n | ∑ mosq | % Protection | Median | IQR | IRR | 95% CI
around IRR |
P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| An. gambiae complex | |||||||||
| Diversion effect | Control indoors | 32 | 164 | 1 | 4 | (2.75 – 6) | 1 | - | |
| Push-pull indoors | 32 | 83 | 0.49 | 2 | (0.75 – 3.25) | 0.52 | (0.35 – 0.76) | 0.006 | |
| Control outdoors | 32 | 544 | 1 | 16 | (10 – 23) | 3.25 | (2.33 – 4.53) | < 0.001 | |
| Push-pull outdoors | 32 | 404 | 0.26 | 9 | (6 – 17) | 2.42 | (1.72 – 3.40) | < 0.001 | |
| An. funestus group | |||||||||
| Diversion effect | Control indoors | 32 | 13 | 1 | 0 | (0 – 1) | 1 | - | |
| Push-pull indoors | 32 | 25 | -0.48 | 0 | (0 – 0) | 2.07 | (1.00 – 3.86) | 0.02 | |
| Control outdoors | 32 | 9 | 1 | 0 | (0 – 1) | 0.46 | (0.18 – 1.21) | > 0.05 | |
| Push-pull outdoors | 32 | 9 | 0 | 0.5 | (0 – 1.25) | 0.71 | (0.30 – 1.66) | > 0.05 | |
| Mansonia species | |||||||||
| Control indoors | 32 | 5 | 1 | 0 | (0 – 0) | 1 | - | ||
| Push-pull indoors | 32 | 21 | -3.2 | 0 | (0 – 0) | 4.01 | (0.82 – 20.0) | 0.458 | |
| Control outdoors | 32 | 10 | 1 | 0 | (0 – 0) | 1.98 | (0.39 – 9.99) | > 0.05 | |
| Push-pull outdoors | 32 | 11 | -0.1 | 0 | (0 – 0.25) | 2.16 | (0.44 – 10.85) | > 0.05 | |
| Culex species | |||||||||
| Diversion effect | Control indoors | 32 | 920 | 1 | 21 | (6.75 – 41.25) | 1 | - | |
| Push-pull indoors | 32 | 900 | 0.02 | 17 | (12 – 44.5) | 1.10 | (0.79 – 1.53) | 0.134 | |
| Control outdoors | 32 | 429 | 1 | 12.5 | (5 – 21.25) | 0.54 | (0.40 – 0.79) | < 0.05 | |
| Push-pull outdoors | 32 | 330 | 0.23 | 9.5 | (4 – 12.25) | 0.45 | (0.32 – 0.65) | < 0.001 | |
**Mosquito diversion effect = Number of mosquito caught indoor and outdoor in control vs. treatment households