Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2017 Dec 6;89(24):13524–13531. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03878

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Estimate of the maximum deviation of the PTIR signal from perfect linearity with respect to the absorption coefficient. For the estimate, we considered an artificial weakly absorbing material with constant a0= 0.02 μm−1 and n = 1.4 and calculated Hopt(a)a(Hopt(a0)a0), normalized to a(Hopt(a0)a0) Sample parameters were n0=2.4, n1 = 1.4 + , n2=1. Calculations were carried out for 100 nm thick (1st column), 500 nm thick (2nd column),1000 nm thick (3rd column) sample and for a semi-infinite sample (4th column, labelled ATR). The horizontal scales above 1900 cm−1 and below 1900 cm−1 are different to highlight changes in the mid-IR fingerprint region.