Table 3.

Evaluation of predictive ability of the FADES model vs. MADIT model vs. SHFM-D model for identifying patients at risk for non-benefit of ICD treatment using NRI and IDI

	IDI (%)	P-value	NRI (%)	P-value	Events correctly reclassified (%)	Non-events correctly reclassified (%)
All patient
FADES vs. MADIT	7	<0.001	−8	0.31	16	−24
FADES vs. SHFM-D	11	<0.001	3	0.71	−13	16
MADIT vs. SHFM-D	4	<0.001	26	<0.001	−26	52

IDI, integrated differentiation improvement; NRI, net reclassification improvement; FADES, NYHA Functional class, Age, Diabetes, Ejection fraction, and history of Smoking; MADIT, Multicentre Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial; SHFM-D, Seattle Heart Failure Model for Defibrillator recipients.