Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Mar 22;46(9):1258–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3601-3

Table 2.

Image interpretation. Definitions of subjective assessment of image quality (a) and PET alignment used for image interpretation (b)

a Images Quality
1 Poor quality, not diagnostically acceptable for interpretation
2 Suboptimal quality, worse than routine images with excessive image noise
3 Acceptable quality, diagnostic interpretation possible but noise more than routine images
4 Good quality, noise similar to routine images
5 Excellent quality, no image noise
b Quality of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT alignment
1 Poor alignment, complete lack of alignment
2 Suboptimal alignment, differs by more than 25 mm
3 Acceptable alignment, differs >5 but <25 mm
4 Good alignment, differs <5 mm
5 Excellent alignment, no misalignment