Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2018 Feb 2;69:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.033

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Matching swelling (A) and compressive modulus (B) between the original 10% PEG(3.4k)DA formulation and the damage-resistant 7.2% PEG(3.4k)DAA + 1:54 mol NVP hydrogel. C) Effect of decreasing polymer content and adding NVP to improve the defect tolerance of the hydrogel. Data represents average ± standard deviation of n=6. The * represents a significant difference from PEGDA (p<0.05) in a student’s t-test.