Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 28;136(2):719–749. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1570-z

Table 2.

Neighbourhood diversity, neighbourhood (valenced) inter-group contact and out-group attitudes

Model type Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS
Outcome Feeling therm. ‘High enjoy’ neighbour mixing ‘Medium enjoy’ neighbour mixing ‘Low enjoy’ neighbour mixing Feeling therm.
SES Disadvantage −1.682 −0.010 0.086 0.009 −1.720
(1.509) (0.069) (0.080) (0.015) (1.464)
Urbanisation 3.270** 0.043 0.062 −0.015 2.784*
(1.128) (0.061) (0.066) (0.016) (1.097)
Skill disadvantage 1.543 0.036 −0.086 −0.009 1.484
(1.368) (0.070) (0.077) (0.013) (1.340)
Neighbourhood diversity −1.073 0.117* 0.140* 0.035* −1.422
(0.946) (0.052) (0.058) (0.017) (0.926)
‘High enjoy.’ Neighbour mixing 3.912***
(0.802)
‘Medium enjoy.’ Neighbour mixing 2.209**
(0.696)
‘Low enjoy.’ Neighbour mixing −12.069***
(2.923)
Constant 45.572*** −0.342 0.822+ 0.074 45.989***
(8.453) (0.449) (0.489) (0.087) (8.531)
N 773 773 773 773 773

Significance levels: + < 0.1; * 0.05; ** 0.01; *** 0.001; models contain all individual-level co-variates (although not shown); clustered standard errors; unstandardized coefficients