Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;18:22. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1030-7

Table 4.

Post-ventriculostomy Analysis

Parameter No Evidence of New/Enlarged ICH (n = 54) Evidence of New/Enlarged ICH (n = 27) p-value
EVD placed by a trainee or mid-level practitioner, n (%) a 19 (35.19) 8 (29.63%) 0.6171
Placement Attempts, (Median ± IQR) (n = 69) b 1 (0) 1 (0) 0.8831
Anticoagulation within 96 h of EVD, n (%) a 14 (25.9) 2 (7.4) 0.048
Prophylactic anticoagulation, n (%) a, d 11 (20.4) 2 (7.4) > 0.999
Antiplatelet within 96 h of EVD, n (%) c 3 (5.6) 6 (22.2) 0.0539
GCS (lowest) POD 1, (Median ± IQR) b 6 ± 6 6 ± 6 0.17
GCS (lowest) POD 2, (Median ± IQR) (n = 80) b 6.5 ± 7.8 4.5 ± 6.5 0.0624
GCS (lowest) POD 3, (Median ± IQR) (n = 76) b 8 ± 10 3 ± 6.8 0.0202
GCS (lowest) POD 4, (Median ± IQR) (n = 72) b 9 ± 10 4 ± 5.3 0.0383

aChi Square

bMann-Whitney U

cFisher’s Exact

dInferential test was performed on in those patients who received anticoagulation