Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;12:445–453. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S156724

Table 3.

Results of the meta-analysis

Follow-up Evaluation tools Studies Patients (PRP/HA) MD 95% CI P<0.05 I2
3 months WOMAC total score 3 153/154 −10.82 −19.74 to −1.91 Yes 89%
WOMAC pain 2 82/84 −0.5 −1.66 to 0.66 No 81%
VAS 2 78/79 −0.98 −2.55 to 0.59 No 95%
EQ VAS 2 144/139 5.91 −1.51 to 13.34 No 79%
6 months WOMAC total score 5 290/289 −14.18 −26.12 to −2.23 Yes 95%
WOMAC pain 4 219/219 −2.0 −3.60 to −0.39 Yes 90%
VAS 2 78/79 −0.82 −1.80 to 0.16 No 83%
WOMAC function 3 170/169 −5.78 −14.73 to 3.16 No 92%
EQ VAS 4 232/228 2.19 −11.47 to 15.85 No 98%
IKDC 4 232/228 8.53 4.52 to 12.53 Yes 79%
12 months WOMAC total score 4 207/194 −15.25 −22.17 to −8.32 Yes 81%
WOMAC pain 3 158/144 −2.22 −3.65 to −0.79 Yes 92%
WOMAC function 3 158/144 −11.17 −16.37 to −5.98 Yes 83%
EQ VAS 2 143/139 −4.64 −21.79 to 12.51 No 98%
IKDC 2 143/139 6.84 −1.96 to 15.63 No 91%

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EQ VAS, EuroQol-visual analog scales; HA, hyaluronic acid; IKDC, Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee; MD, mean difference; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.