Table 1C. .
Study |
Task |
ACL Reconstruction Sample Size |
Comparison Group Sample Size |
Mean ± SD |
Landing Phase |
Cohen d Effect Size (95% CI) |
Weighted Effect Size |
||
ACL Reconstruction-Limb Hip Internal-Rotation Angle |
ACL Contralateral-Limb Hip Internal-Rotation Angle |
Healthy Hip Internal-Rotation Angle |
|||||||
Delahunt et al51 (2012) | Double-limb landing | 13 | 16 | 0.5 ± 7.7 | NA | −5.8 ± 5.5 | Joint excursion | 0.96 (0.19, 1.73) | 3.90 |
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) | NA | ||||||||
Ortiz et al60 (2008) | Single | 14 | 15 | 5.0 ± 5.0 | NA | 1.8 ± 2.1 | Peak | 0.82 (0.06, 1.57) | 3.39 |
Webster et al67 (2012) | Single | 15 | 11 | 9.1 ± 10.6 | NA | 7.9 ± 10.4 | Peak | 0.11 (−0.67, 0.89) | 0.45 |
Delahunt et al51 (2012) | Single | 13 | 16 | 3.2 ± 8.1 | NA | −1.1 ± 4.2 | Joint excursion | 0.75 (−0.01, 1.51) | 3.12 |
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) | 0.56 (0.12, 1.00) | ||||||||
Webster et al67 (2012) | Single | 15 | 11 | 9.1 ± 10.6 | 2.0 ± 8.8 | NA | Joint excursion | 0.71 (−0.09, 1.50) | 4.27 |
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) | NA |
Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; single, single-limb landing.