Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb;53(2):144–159. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-334-16

Table 1C. .

Between-Groups Comparisons and Cohen d Effect Sizes of Transverse-Plane Hip-Joint Angles

Study
Task
ACL Reconstruction Sample Size
Comparison Group Sample Size
Mean ± SD
Landing Phase
Cohen d Effect Size (95% CI)
Weighted Effect Size
ACL Reconstruction-Limb Hip Internal-Rotation Angle
ACL Contralateral-Limb Hip Internal-Rotation Angle
Healthy Hip Internal-Rotation Angle
Delahunt et al51 (2012) Double-limb landing 13 16 0.5 ± 7.7 NA −5.8 ± 5.5 Joint excursion 0.96 (0.19, 1.73) 3.90
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) NA
Ortiz et al60 (2008) Single 14 15 5.0 ± 5.0 NA 1.8 ± 2.1 Peak 0.82 (0.06, 1.57) 3.39
Webster et al67 (2012) Single 15 11 9.1 ± 10.6 NA 7.9 ± 10.4 Peak 0.11 (−0.67, 0.89) 0.45
Delahunt et al51 (2012) Single 13 16 3.2 ± 8.1 NA −1.1 ± 4.2 Joint excursion 0.75 (−0.01, 1.51) 3.12
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) 0.56 (0.12, 1.00)
Webster et al67 (2012) Single 15 11 9.1 ± 10.6 2.0 ± 8.8 NA Joint excursion 0.71 (−0.09, 1.50) 4.27
Combined pooled effect size (95% CI) NA

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; single, single-limb landing.