Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;6(1):1348876. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2017.1348876

Table 1.

Quality principles for medical education.

Elements Description
Ethical, transparent and responsible engagement [15,16] Transparency regarding funding
  Transparency regarding roles and responsibilities
  Disclosure of interests and resolution of potential conflicts
  No disguised promotion
  No attempt to influence expert committee or faculty decisions
  Compliance with EFPIA and local codes of practice, including Disclosure of Transfer of Value codes
  Adherence to data-privacy legislation
  Compliance with research ethics requirements, data-protection legislation and copyright arrangements
  Compliance with anti-bribery and corruption policies
Needs-based, up-to-date, balanced and objective content Needs-based; i.e. validation by literature, programme scientific committee or a dedicated educational needs assessment
  Provision of scientifically balanced perspectives on the subject matter with involvement of scientific committees when appropriate
  Use of the most appropriate, current and evidence-based content
  Use of adult learning principles [17,18]
  Relevant to learners
  Applicable to clinical practice
Robust and standardised processes to deliver the Educational needs assessment with the defined target group
educational programmes [1926] Application of the principles of instructional design [27]
  Definition of:
  intended programme objectives
  clear and measurable learning objectives
  the target audience and their responsibilities
  Identification of the most effective educational format
  Development of content
  Programme deployment
  Identification and responsible engagement of learners according to strict selection criteria based on educational needs
  Delegation of financial support for travel and housing (direct or indirect sponsorship) must follow EFPIA/local regulations and company compliance codes
  Mechanisms to increase learning impact
  Tools to enhance learners’ active involvement
  Recognition of learning styles
  Expert committee and faculty responsible for planning, developing and reviewing agenda and content based on educational objectives
  Clear and transparent procedures to ensure declaration of interests and resolution of any conflicts prior to the activity
  Outcomes measurement (evaluation of knowledge gain as a minimum requirement) according to the levels determined by the Moore model [19]

For the development of the criteria outlined in Table 1, scientific references, codex and guiding principle publications have been referenced as applicable. EFPIA, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations.